Constituents Accuse Moulton Of Sexism At Town Hall Over Push To Oust Pelosi

Lynn, MA- April 08, 2017: Congressman Seth Moulton answers a question during a public town hall meeting at North Shore Community College in Lynn, MA on April 08, 2017. (Globe staff photo / Craig F. Walker) section: metro reporter:
LYNN, MA - APRIL 8: Congressman Seth Moulton answers a question during a public town hall meeting at North Shore Community College in Lynn, MA on Apr. 8, 2017. (Photo by Craig F. Walker/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rep. Seth Moulton (D-MA), who has spearheaded the effort to pass over Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for the House speakership, faced some unhappy constituents at a Monday night town hall dominated by talk of the upcoming vote.

According to a Monday Politico report, constituents pushed back against his assertion that Democrats want the leadership change, demanding he at least name a replacement candidate.

Some pointed to the letter signed by a small group of House Democrats asking for new leadership as evidence of the underlying sexism behind the movement, as only two female lawmakers had attached their names. Moulton denied the claim, insisting that more women were quietly behind the effort who declined to sign the letter.

Moulton’s leadership on the attempted rebellion may cost him politically: per Politico, organizers have set up a crowdfunding site to support a primary challenger in 2020.

Latest News
87
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. I’m not sure its sexism so much as wanting to make a name for himself for future Senate run should Warren take the presidential bid to fruition or when Markey is ready to step away.

    To bad for Moulton, I think the young Kennedy has a clearer shot.

  2. It is odd that old men don’t seem to be the problem. Only old women.

  3. Avatar for fgs fgs says:

    I guess I’m still not clear who even wants to be Speaker, let alone what’s wrong with Pelosi, what anyone else would do differently, or their odds of achieving a better result. It’s all completely pie-in-the-sky.

  4. Yes, we need to separate the grandstanders from the genuine. The opportunists won’t be able to hide their true motivation, no matter how much they practice their talking points. What’s best for the country has to come first.

  5. Love the idea of crowd funding his opponent if he continues on this course. If we’re going to live in a post Citizen’s United world let the peeps call some shots.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

81 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for fess Avatar for fgs Avatar for jcs Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for ajileye Avatar for cervantes Avatar for bimble Avatar for go2goal Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for tena Avatar for bookman Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for katscherger Avatar for georgial1beral Avatar for sydneyp22 Avatar for dangnewt Avatar for the_loan_arranger Avatar for raymd Avatar for antb Avatar for zillacop Avatar for kenga Avatar for leeblzm Avatar for isaleshko

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: