SCOTUS Denies Ohio Dems’ Request To Re-Instate Order Against Trump Campaign

The flag flies at half-staff outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 16, 2016, following the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia over the weekend. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Supreme Court denied the request by Democrats to reinstate a restraining order that had been placed on the Trump campaign by a federal judge in an order, an order that was later blocked by an appeals court panel. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg included a statement in the denial that noted that Ohio law already prohibits the voter intimidation tactics that the original order blocked the Trump campaign from committing.

The move came in a lawsuit filed by Ohio Democrats late last month alleging that the Trump campaign — along with the Ohio Republican Party, Trump-ally Roger Stone and his group Stop the Steal — were encouraging illegal voter intimidation tactics. Similar lawsuits were filed by state Democratic parties elsewhere in the country.

The federal judge presiding over the Ohio case placed a temporary restraining order on the Trump campaign and Stone on Friday, but not the Ohio GOP, as he said there was not enough evidence to merit an order against it. The order prohibited the Trump campaign, Stone and his group “from conspiring to intimidate, threaten, harass, or coerce voters on Election Day.”

The Trump campaign appealed the order to the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, and a panel of appellate judges stayed the order on Sunday, prompting the Democrats’ emergency application to the Supreme Court later that evening.

Legal observers noted Ginsburg’s apparent participation in the stay denial, as her criticisms of Trump over the summer (which she later walked back) prompted some to wonder whether she would have to recuse herself from any Trump-related elections case.

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. Color me surprised. But the Notorious RBG throws a rope.

  2. So, just because the state has a law (that they don’t enforce, evidently), then the feds can’t step in? Seriously, what is wrong with the SCOTUS with regards to voting??

  3. FUCK YOU SCOTUS. In an election year, you should err on the side of the rights of voters, not the rights of political campaigns.

  4. Avatar for meta meta says:

    Rock and a hardplace. McConnell broke the Supreme Court, too. One thing for sure, they won’t be deciding the outcome of the 2016 election. All they can do now is avoid split decisions.

    The blowback on blocking PBO’s nominee should be monstrous, but nobody is holding their breath.

  5. Congratulations Ohio GOP. There is no longer a TRO preventing you from doing the illegal things you claimed you were never doing.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for boidster Avatar for beattycat Avatar for meta Avatar for tiowally

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: