Schiff: House Intel ‘United’ That Bannon Should Answer All Their Questions

on November 30, 2017 in Washington, DC.
WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 30: Ranking member Adam Schiff (D-CA) speaks about today's testimoy from U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions during a door session of the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill, Nove... WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 30: Ranking member Adam Schiff (D-CA) speaks about today's testimoy from U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions during a door session of the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill, November 30, 2017 in Washington, DC. The committee is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence committee said that Steve Bannon should face contempt hearings if he continued to refuse to answer all of the committee’s questions. In a statement, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said the committee was “united on this matter.”

Schiff’s statement also accused the White House of blocking Bannon’s testimony, alleging that Bannon’s lawyer informed the committee that he would only answer “a set of fourteen yes-or-no questions the White House had pre-approved” regarding the presidential transition, Bannon’s tenure in the White House and Bannon’s conversations with President Trump after he left.

Bannon’s initial appearance in front of the House Intel Committee last month devolved into confusion when he, apparently upon instructions from the White House, declined to answer any questions covering the time after the 2016 campaign. His refusal prompted the committee to serve him a subpoena on the spot — a rare moment of bipartisanship for an investigation typically wracked with acrimony.

As they came out of a committee meeting on Monday evening, House Intel Democrats and Republicans alike said they expected Bannon to show up Tuesday morning and comply with their subpoena.

“We have all the tools that the House has to enforce subpoenas and we’ll take the steps necessary,” Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX), a Republican leader of the Russia probe, said. “I expect him to be here.”

However, later that evening it was reported that Bannon would be a no-show. The interview, according to Schiff and other lawmakers, has now been rescheduled for next week.

Meanwhile, Bannon is also planning to be interviewed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, during which he reportedly intends to answer anything Mueller asks of him.

“Testifying before the Special Counsel does not obviate Mr. Bannon’s obligations under the subpoena issued by the Committee,” Schiff said. “Should Bannon maintain his refusal to return and testify fully to all questions, the Committee should begin contempt proceedings to compel his testimony.”

Neither the White House nor Bannon’s attorney responded to TPM’s requests for comment.

Read the full Schiff statement below:

“This week, Steve Bannon’s counsel informed the Committee that the White House continues to prohibit Mr. Bannon from testifying to the Committee beyond a set of fourteen yes-or-no questions the White House had pre-approved. The White House’s bar on Bannon’s testimony covers matters during the transition, his tenure at the White House, and his communications with the President since leaving government service, even though the President has not in fact invoked executive privilege.

“This is unacceptable, and the Committee remains united on this matter – the Committee’s subpoena remains in effect and his interview has been rescheduled for next week. Testifying before the Special Counsel does not obviate Mr. Bannon’s obligations under the subpoena issued by the Committee. Should Bannon maintain his refusal to return and testify fully to all questions, the Committee should begin contempt proceedings to compel his testimony.”

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. I’d be okay with waterboarding in this case…

    Get questions answered and start cleaning the SOB up…

  2. Avatar for erik_t erik_t says:

    I think the only thing left that can really get Republicans (especially in the House) to act is to challenge their importance.

    Almost nobody who thinks his or her self powerful can ignore a man who takes a piddle on their fiefdom.

    (testicle-gargler extraordinaire Devin Nunes is an interesting exception)

  3. Avatar for eb5 eb5 says:

    #whatsbannonhiding sounds good to me.

  4. Bannon’s lawyer informed the committee that he would only answer “a set of fourteen yes-or-no questions the White House had pre-approved.”

    And for each yes/no, he would not identify the question to which it pertained.

    (Bill Burck is certainly working hard for his money.)

  5. I guess if he’d tell the truth freely we might learn more than what Mueller is probably finding, but I’m just about willing to bet that Donald and company, especially his family members, didn’t do a very good job of keeping things under wrap and there’s a shit load of evidence without Bannon. Probably just be more of a confirmation.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

3 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for cervantes Avatar for mike_in_houston Avatar for eb5 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for greysea Avatar for maximus Avatar for erik_t

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: