NC GOP Says New Fraud Claim May Warrant Election Re-Do In Race Under Scrutiny

Republican NC-9th District Congressional candidate Mark Harris answers questions at a news conference at the Matthews Town Hall on Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, in Matthews, N.C. Harris declared victory over Democrat Dan McCready early Wednesday morning and McCready later conceded. (David T. Foster III/Charlotte Observer/TNS)
Republican NC-9th District Congressional candidate Mark Harris answers questions at a news conference at the Matthews Town Hall on Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, in Matthews, N.C. Harris declared victory over Democrat Dan ... Republican NC-9th District Congressional candidate Mark Harris answers questions at a news conference at the Matthews Town Hall on Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2018, in Matthews, N.C. Harris declared victory over Democrat Dan McCready early Wednesday morning and McCready later conceded. (David T. Foster III/Charlotte Observer/TNS via Getty Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

New allegations that a House race in North Carolina — which is already under investigation due to an apparent absentee ballot fraud scheme — was also the site of an improper release of early vote totals prompted the state Republican Party on Tuesday to call for a new election in the race if the new claims prove true.

The new allegations, reported on by the Charlotte Observer, emerged with the release of documents from the North Carolina’s State Board of Elections’ investigation into the alleged absentee fraud scheme, where ground zero of the probe is Bladen County, a part of the North Carolina’s ninth congressional district.

Reports with vote totals released by the state board showed that a tally at the only early voting location in Bladen County was run on November 3. North Carolina law mandates that such a tallying wait for the closing of all polls — in this case, 7:30 p.m. on November 6.

Additionally, according to the Charlotte Observer, a poll worker said in affidavit that the report was run on November 3 and that it “was viewed by officials … who were not judges,” which, in the poll worker’s understanding, was “improper.”

North Carolina GOP Chair Robin Hayes said in a statement Tuesday that such a “leak” of early vote totals “would be a fundamental violation of the sense of fair play, honesty, and integrity that the Republican Party stands for.”

“The people involved in this must be held accountable and should it be true, this fact alone would likely require a new election,” Hayes said.

Hayes pointed to the surprise recent resignation of the chair of the county board of elections, a Democrat, to argue that a “systematic failure of the election process in this area of the state” had been “going on for at least the last decade.”

Hayes’ statement called for the state board, rather than the county board, to oversee the new election in the House race if the state board decides one should be held.

The Republican candidate Mark Harris (pictured above) currently leads Democrat Dan McCready by just 905 votes, but the state board declined to certify the election earlier this month and voted to pursue an investigation into the election instead. The board said it would hold a hearing on or before December 21 on the evidence its probe turns up.

The investigation so far appears focused on an absentee voting operation run by Leslie McCrae Dowless, who reportedly paid workers to collect absentee ballots from voters. North Carolina law says that only the voters themselves or their close relatives can turn in absentee ballots.

The North Carolina GOP at first demanded that Harris’ victory be certified right away, arguing that there weren’t enough absentee ballots in question to change the outcome of the race. The party has since said that it supports the investigation proceeding, and would be in favor of a new election if the board found a “substantial likelihood” that the ballot scheme changed the impact of the race.

Under North Carolina law, state election officials don’t need to find that fraud changed an election’s outcome in order to call a new election. The state statute allows election officials to take any action “necessary to assure that an election is determined without taint of fraud or corruption.”

Latest Muckraker

Notable Replies

  1. The N.C. GOP is astonishingly corrupt, even by the dismal standards of that party.

  2. Why redo a Congressional race? Why not award the seat to the person who did not commit fraud?

    Is fraud even a crime when it is committed by conservatives?

    The entire Presidential election was a fraud on the American people and a Soviet-era Russian puppet is in the White House. We have an entire family of Matryoshka dolls and traitors running American government and looting from the Treasury to pad their offshore bank accounts. Given there is a fraudster as commander-in-chief, is there any need to waste taxpayer money on a fraudulent election in a mickey mouse county in North Carolina?

  3. “without taint of fraud or corruption”

    Which reminds me, did you see that Rick Santorum’s name was on the Chief of Staff shortlist?

  4. And to think, it’s actually because of NC’s openness with data that we even found out about all of this.

    Hard to believe that this is the one county in all of America that shenanigans have happened.

    Would be nice to get some Federal transparency and common rules out there, so we’d see just how many Republicans “won” and where.

  5. I think the word used should not be “fraud.” Improper procedurally, yes, but I don’t think that there are any allegations of vote-changing.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

43 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for dv01 Avatar for jdkahler Avatar for bojimbo26 Avatar for rodnchance Avatar for hassler Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for sickneffintired Avatar for midnight_rambler Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for generalsternwood Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for bp71 Avatar for georgemilquetoast Avatar for docd Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for castor_troy Avatar for tpr Avatar for spin Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for sacarrow Avatar for occamscoin Avatar for arawak Avatar for dicktater

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: