They've got muck; we've got rakes. TPM Muckraker

AP's John Solomon - One More for the Road

Was the state commission in favor of this TV network regulation as part of the new federal commission? Hard to figure since they didn't want the commission at all.

But were they? Apparently not. Keith Kizer, the Executive Director of the Nevada Athletic Commission, told me that they've "taken no position on that issue." The issue was a bureaucratic matter of whether the networks should be classified as promoters or not. Kizer said such a classification didn't affect the commission either way. It's academic.

So maybe the TV network thing was a poison pill that KO'd the bill in the House?

Nope. Apparently not that either.

House Republicans have consistently, over a number of years, been opposed to a federal boxing commission for one overarching reason: they don't want federal oversight in boxing, period. As Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) said on the floor of Congress, "This is a big government bill that creates a new Federal agency." Whether TV networks were classified as promoters or not didn't make any difference to them. And it doesn't seem to have had anything to do with the bill's fate.

According to a Democratic source in the House involved in trying to get the bill passed, "The Republicans voted it down because they didn't want increased federal oversight. 'States rights' were a big subject of the debate. The breakdown of the vote reflects that."

The bill was defeated 233-190, with most Republicans voting against it.

Moreoever, for this to have been some sneaky gambit by Reid, you'd think he wouldn't be so vocal about it. But Reid has consistently - literally for years - lobbied for the networks to be classified as promoters. In 1999, he testified in a Senate committee hearing on a past incarnation of the bill that such a measure should be included. That history makes it pretty hard to believe he intended it as a poison pill.

So let's read that passage again with what we know now ...

Reid told AP the free tickets did not influence his position, noting he voted for the legislation when it passed the Senate. However, Reid had forced a change in the bill that let the federal commission regulate the TV networks when they promoted fights. After the change, the House never approved the legislation.

Is there any way to think this isn't yet another Solomon bamboozle? And the worst yet?