Spox Argues Trump Isn’t Skeptical Of US Intelligence Data, Just Its ‘Conclusions’

FILE - In this Oct. 13, 2016 file photo, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivers a speech in Columbus, Ohio. The state’s role this year shapes up to be potential spoiler for Trump’s chances of rea... FILE - In this Oct. 13, 2016 file photo, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivers a speech in Columbus, Ohio. The state’s role this year shapes up to be potential spoiler for Trump’s chances of reaching 270 electoral votes. While Hillary Clinton appears to have paths to the total needed for election without Ohio, the state’s 20 votes are considered crucial for Trump. (AP Photo/ Evan Vucci) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

President-elect Donald Trump isn’t skeptical of the actual data compiled by the U.S. intelligence community, he just doubts the “conclusions” that community presents, at least according to incoming White House press secretary Sean Spicer.

Spicer told reporters on a Wednesday morning conference call that Trump is “looking forward” to hearing what FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper have to say on the subject when they brief him Friday on the Russian-backed hacking of Democratic groups in the 2016 election.

“I think the data is one thing,” Spicer said. “Asking people how they came to the conclusions is quite another, and I think what he wants to hear from them is, how does the raw intelligence justify the conclusion that is being presented to them?”

Spicer said there is a “big difference” between the presidential daily briefing Trump receives, which he said consists of “raw data,” and a second briefing the President-elect gets from his national security team, who analyze that data.

“It’s the job of the political advisors, if you will, the NSC staff and others, CIA director, DNI director, to then provide the President-elect and others with the analysis and recommendations,” Spicer said. “I think the President-elect is more skeptical of the conclusions that are drawn from the raw data rather than the intelligence and the raw data that’s provided.”

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Because as everyone should know, Trump is well known for his acumen in intelligence analysis, much like his expertise in climatology, public health, cybernetics, number theory, hydrology, reproductive biology, cosmology, evolutionary biology…

  2. Avatar for johnrm johnrm says:

    Oh i get it…evidence is now raw data and the process of which they got that data is now a conclusion…And now dumpsters going to have his own security team evaluate the data and most likely counter the CIA/DNI/FBI…and then dismiss everything like it never happened…

    what is red is now green…a cat is now a dog…

  3. Oh shit …

    I still haven’t received my decoder from ACME —

  4. Avatar for tena tena says:

    Donald J. Trump
    :heavy_check_mark:
    @realDonaldTrump

    " Julian
    Assange said “a 14 year old could have hacked Podesta” - why was DNC so
    careless? Also said Russians did not give him the info!"

    Tell us more, Trumpski. Why don’t you just replace all our intelligence services with Assange - since you only pay attention to him.

    This is so unbelievable.

  5. Did Spicer melt down at the end of the call?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

71 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for oldvet Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for jjrothery Avatar for docb Avatar for cd Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for geofu54 Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for darrtown Avatar for tena Avatar for edhedh Avatar for rickjones Avatar for tiowally Avatar for canyoncountry Avatar for karma5230 Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for katscherger Avatar for the_loan_arranger

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: