Trump Used Foundation To Connect With Social Conservatives Ahead Of 2016 Bid

Donald Trump speaks at the 42nd annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) February 27, 2015 in National Harbor, Maryland. Conservative activists attended the annual political conference to discuss their ... Donald Trump speaks at the 42nd annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) February 27, 2015 in National Harbor, Maryland. Conservative activists attended the annual political conference to discuss their agenda. Photo by Olivier Douliery/Sipa USA MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Donald Trump used his private foundation — funded largely by outsider contributions — to build relationships with social conservative groups ahead of his 2016 presidential bid, an examination by Real Clear Politics published Tuesday found.

In one case, the Trump Foundation may have violated IRS rules by donating to a not-for-profit allowed to engage in a political activity — and thus subject to tougher regulations regarding incoming contributions — as opposed to a traditional charity. The other transactions highlighted by Real Clear Politics reveal a pattern starting in 2011 of Trump speaking at right wing groups’ confabs around the same time the Trump Foundation was making donations to their non-profit affiliates, though the RCP report stopped short of alleging an explicit quid pro quo.

“He was politically active starting in 2011,” a source with ties to Trump told RCP, adding that around that time Trump “started to make strategic donations.”

Trump Foundation tax filings between in 2011 and 2014 showed that it donated up at least $286,000 to noteworthy conservative or policy groups, RCP reported. Often times, the contributions were from Trump’s foundation to the charity arms of the social conservative groups. However, Trump Foundation tax returns from 2013 show a $10,000 contribution to The Family Leader — a 501(c)(4) that is allowed to engage in limited political activity and thus receives more scrutiny — rather than to the group’s 501(c)(3) charity affiliate the Family Leader Foundation, according to RCP.

“There’s a mistake somewhere,” Rosemary Fei, a partner at the Adler & Colvin law firm in San Francisco, who specializes in charity law, told RCP. “It might be a really substantive mistake, or it could just be a reporting error or sloppiness. But improper reporting is still a violation of tax law. That’s something the IRS would look at.”

Even in instances where the Trump Foundation probably did not violate charity tax law, the foundation’s transactions paint a picture of how Trump made inroads with the social conservative movement — which had reason to be skeptical of the flashy New York billionaire — as he laid the ground work for his campaign for the GOP nomination.

The RCP report comes as the Trump Foundation is under investigation by the New York Attorney General’s office, which ordered last week that it cease its fundraising activities because it lacked the proper certification to solicit contributions. Trump himself stopped donating to the foundation after 2008, according to tax filings, and its coffers have since been filled outside contributors.

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. I’ll bet that a close examination reveals more than one illegal (or erroneous, if you want to call it that) contribution in those discussed here. Although the tax law is not exactly scrupulous in classifying 501©(3) organizations.

  2. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    Serious question. Has Trump done anything, anything at all, that hasn’t been beneficial to himself or his family, either directly or indirectly?

    From his Foundation, his bankruptcies, not paying contractors, bankrupting shareholders, Trump University, leading the birther movement, and now aggravating racial and religious tensions in this country. He doesn’t care about the trail of tears he leaves behind, as long as it’s personally beneficial.

  3. The evident intertwining of convenient contributions and the recipients’ epiphany that Donald is to be lauded as furthering a radically revised and just revealed version of God’s will, does seem like a sale of indulgences. Anyway: The ‘conservative’ religiosity crowd do seem to have a passion for golden calves.

  4. Great timing, because Pence can’t possibly be ready with a lawyer vetted answer by debate time—not with all the other shit he has to shovel.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

57 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for paulw Avatar for slbinva Avatar for fgs Avatar for feathered_head Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for epicurus Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for rudesan Avatar for crackerjack Avatar for carlosfiance Avatar for chuck_voellinger Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for sgjsdad Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for dickweed Avatar for benthere Avatar for pshah Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for tena Avatar for mm Avatar for asturcot Avatar for natasbob

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: