SCOTUS Lets Texas Voter ID Law Stand … For Now

FILE - In this Feb. 26, 2014 file photo, an election official checks a voter's photo identification at an early voting polling site in Austin, Texas. A majority of the nation's highest court on Saturday Oct. 18, 2014... FILE - In this Feb. 26, 2014 file photo, an election official checks a voter's photo identification at an early voting polling site in Austin, Texas. A majority of the nation's highest court on Saturday Oct. 18, 2014 rejected an emergency request from the Justice Department and civil rights groups to prohibit the state from requiring voters to produce certain forms of photo identification in order to cast ballots. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Supreme Court denied a request Friday to halt Texas’ voter ID law while a lower court hears a case challenging it but, in a silver lining for the law’s opponents, signaled it would reconsider if the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals tried to slow roll the case.

The 2011 law, which Texas was only able to implement after the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act in 2013, has been shot down by a district court and a three-judge panel in the 5th Circuit. The state appealed the case to the full 5th Circuit, which agreed last month to hear it “en banc,” meaning by all 15 judges on the circuit court.

In an order issued Friday, the Supreme Court said it would not overrule an earlier decision by the 5th Circuit that left the law in effect while the case is being heard. However, it said that if the Court of Appeals doesn’t issue a decision on the pending case by July 20, the parties in the case could ask the Supreme Court again to weigh whether the law should be blocked. They could also ask the court to consider blocking it if there is “any change in circumstances before that date supports further arguments.”

“The Court recognizes the time constraints the parties confront in light of the scheduled elections in November, 2016,” the order said.

Texas’ law, considered on of the strictest voter ID laws in the nation, is being challenged by voting rights groups and the Department of Justice.

Latest Livewire
29
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Think of it this way: it’s better for it to remain in effect so that the impetus is there for people to keep trying to get their IDs in the interim. If at any point it is upheld, we don’t want people having to scramble to comply, including the state doing whatever it is supposed to be doing to implement the law, like making the IDs available etc. I’m guessing that was part of the SCOTUS’s reasoning.

  2. It would be great if this went to the Supreme Court. It would give us a chance to see if Justice Roberts is what he says he is. He ruled to eliminate VRA protections on a claim they were no longer needed. Well…they are and here is his chance to fix that. Or show himself to be a GOP operative in a robe.

  3. They can work on making those ID’s available but that’s not going to stop that fact to get one you go through an interaction with government minions and folks don’t want to do that. You can put a DMV on every corner but a lot of folks won’t go…they hate that shit. The GOP knew that…and that’s why we are here.

  4. The GOP is dedicated to stealing elections and the GOP Supreme Court is part of this effort. After all, the 2000 Presidential election was stolen by GOP Justices.

    Will Roberts put an end to GOP election crime?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

23 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for harry_truman Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for vatvslpr Avatar for thehatter Avatar for danf Avatar for granna129 Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for losamigos Avatar for irasdad Avatar for kenstarr Avatar for sniffit Avatar for bethinor Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for go2goal Avatar for ignoreland Avatar for pb Avatar for mongoose Avatar for georgekaplan Avatar for manziel Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for carlo43 Avatar for machoneman Avatar for coimmigrant

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: