Texas Polling Places Still Advertising False Info About Voter ID Law

FILE - In this Feb. 26, 2014 file photo, an election official checks a voter's photo identification at an early voting polling site in Austin, Texas. A majority of the nation's highest court on Saturday Oct. 18, 2014... FILE - In this Feb. 26, 2014 file photo, an election official checks a voter's photo identification at an early voting polling site in Austin, Texas. A majority of the nation's highest court on Saturday Oct. 18, 2014 rejected an emergency request from the Justice Department and civil rights groups to prohibit the state from requiring voters to produce certain forms of photo identification in order to cast ballots. (AP Photo/Eric Gay, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A number of poll places in Texas are disseminating inaccurate and out-dated information about the state’s voter ID law, which was softened by court order after an appeals court ruled it discriminatory, The Texas Tribune reported Tuesday.

Voters and voting rights advocates spotted some polling places advertising old posters spelling out the state’s ID requirement that did not explain the newly imposed carve-out for voters who faced a reasonable impediments in obtaining the required ID, the Tribune reported. Additionally, some voters heard poll workers telling those waiting in line to vote to get out the required IDs without mentioning the court-approved exemption, the Tribune said.

“This is a situation where the Secretary of State produced [updated] materials, and you can find them online,” Nina Perales, the vice president of litigation for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, one of the groups that sued Texas over the law, told the Texas Tribune. “The idea that polling place supply boxes were being filled with the wrong posters is so incredibly frustrating for people who have been working on this issue for years.”

The confusion comes after Texas was dragged back into court for promoting educational materials with harsher language than what the court had approved in an agreement among the parties. The state’s 2011 voter ID law was found in July by the full 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to have the effect of discriminating against minorities. Under the court-approved agreement that followed, Texas now must allow non-ID holders to vote if they show a supporting form of identification — like a bank statement or a utility bill — and sign an affidavit saying they had a reasonable impediment in obtaining the ID required by the 2011 law.

According to the Texas Tribune report, at least a dozen poll places in Texas’ Bexar County were found hanging inaccurate posters that did not include an explanation of the exemption, which some poll workers in that county and elsewhere also failed to mention when preparing the people waiting in line to vote.

One Houston attorney recounted on Facebook his confrontation with a poll worker at a voting site who was not explaining to voters the option for non-ID holders. An election-site judge had to intervene when the poll worker at first refused to change her routine, the attorney said, according to the Texas Tribune.

“You always want to believe that these are merely errors that could be fixed with better training, or errors based upon inconsistent information,” Scott Rothenberg, the attorney, said. “You always hope that it is not is an effort to disenfranchise certain voters.”

The Bexar County clerk’s office told the Texas Tribune that the old posters had been replaced with ones with accurate information, though Perales said that her group was still finding inaccurate posters at poll sites.

Other elections officials denied any malicious intent in the poll workers’ failure to educate voters about the exemption.

“Because of the high volume of voters, they are probably unwittingly not being completely accurate,” said Hector DeLeon, a spokesman for the clerk in Harris County, which includes Houston.

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: