Price: Proposed $880 Billion Medicaid Cut Wouldn’t Cut Medicaid Coverage

prepares to give testimony before the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions on his nomination to serve as US Secretary of Health and Human Services on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Tom Price ... prepares to give testimony before the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions on his nomination to serve as US Secretary of Health and Human Services on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC. Tom Price Confirmation Hearing, Washington, USA - 18 Jan 2017 (Rex Features via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price argued Sunday that Republicans’ proposed $880 billion Medicaid cut would not impact Medicaid coverage.

President Donald Trump continually repeated as a candidate for that office, on Twitter and in recorded speeches, that he would not touch Medicaid funding.

A Congressional Budget Office analysis of the first, failed iteration of Republicans’ health bill found it would decrease direct federal spending on Medicaid by $880 billion over 10 years — a 25 percent decrease in 2026 versus the status quo — and that 14 million fewer people would be enrolled in the program by 2026. Though Senate Republicans have said they will write their own health bill, House Republicans’ version would roll back Obamacare’s expansion of Medicaid and put a per-capita cap on Medicaid dollars to the states.

In an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper, Price said those cuts would create “a system that would allow the states to tailor their Medicaid program to” the elderly, disabled, mothers and children, “thereby saving money, yes, but also making it so that they have a higher level of care, a higher quality of care than they currently do.”

Tapper pressed Price to explain how the nearly-trillion dollar proposed cut wouldn’t discourage doctors from taking Medicaid, as reimbursement rates would be lower.

Price said the massive cut would allow “greater flexibility, so that more resources could be put to the seniors and the disabled, and appropriate resources could be put to the healthy moms and kids in the Medicaid system.”

Republicans’ plan would shift much of the cost of covering beneficiaries of Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion back to the states, effectively forcing them to shrink their Medicaid population.

Vox’s Sarah Kliff noted Sunday that, while Republicans’ plan includes tax breaks for individuals to purchase care on the individual market, the plans available to them would be more expensive and less comprehensive than Medicaid, leading many individuals to give up on looking for insurance altogether.

“Are you actually saying that $880 billion in cuts, according to the CBO, however you want to talk about that not being a cut, that that’s actually not going to result in millions of Americans not getting Medicaid?” Tapper finally asked.

“Absolutely not,” Price said. “And we believe strongly that the Medicaid population that will be cared for in a better way under our program — because it will be more responsive to them.”

“These decisions will be made closer to them,” he continued. “Right now you’ve got Washington, D.C. Dictating to the states and dictating to patients exactly what must occur. That’s not how a healthy health system works. A healthy health system works by allowing those individuals closest to the patients themselves to be making those decisions. From the President’s perspective and our perspective that means patients and families and doctors making medical decisions, not Washington, D.C.”

Latest Livewire
77
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Nobody knew that simple math could be so hard.

  2. Republican math: X - 8.8E11 = X

  3. More GOP local empowerment BS. The “healthcare” legislation has always been a money grab.

  4. The newest GOP TV gameshow craze is The Price is Wrong

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

71 more replies

Participants

Avatar for playitagainrowlf Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for fgs Avatar for marnold Avatar for sysprog Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for jep07 Avatar for brutus1910 Avatar for scottsa Avatar for turtles_run Avatar for dont Avatar for sniffit Avatar for stradivarius50t3 Avatar for careysub Avatar for darrtown Avatar for diveguy99 Avatar for spencersmom Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for lizzymom Avatar for charliedontsurf Avatar for coprophagoussmile Avatar for jeff8001 Avatar for ohcomeonnow Avatar for loyd

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: