GOP Senator Warns Trump Admin. Against Cutting Funds For Drug Czar

Chairman Rob Portman of Ohio, listens during a hearing of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to review billing and customer service practices in the cable and satellite television industry, on Capitol Hill, Thursday, June 23, 2016 in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
FILE - In this June 23, 2016 file photo, Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio listens during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington. A key question looms for vulnerable Republican senators this election season: If Donald Trump ... FILE - In this June 23, 2016 file photo, Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio listens during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington. A key question looms for vulnerable Republican senators this election season: If Donald Trump loses and loses big, can they still survive? Trump’s declining standing in the polls has GOP Senate candidates preparing for the worst 11 weeks before Election Day, and they’re maneuvering now to put as big a margin as they can between themselves and the top of the ticket. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File) MORE LESS

Following a reports that the White House is looking to drastically cut funding for the Office of National Drug Control Policy in the 2018 budget, Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) on Friday warned that such cuts would hurt the country’s ability to fight the opioid crisis.

“I’ve known and worked with our drug czars for more than 20 years and this agency is critical to our efforts to combat drug abuse in general, and this opioid epidemic, in particular. This office supports the Drug Free Communities Act, legislation I authored in 1997 which has provided more than $1 billion to community drug coalitions around the country over the last 20 years, as well as the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas program, which has helped states like Ohio that are ground zero for this problem,” Portman said in a statement.

“We have a heroin and prescription drug crisis in this country and we should be supporting efforts to reverse this tide, not proposing drastic cuts to those who serve on the front lines of this epidemic,” he concluded.

Both Politico and the New York Times on Friday reported that the Trump administration is looking into a 95 percent cut in funding for the office.

Asked about the reports Friday afternoon, Deputy White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said that she would not “comment on ongoing discussions.”

“Again, there’s not a final document,” she added. “When there is, we’d certainly be happy to discuss that. I think the bigger point here is the President has made very clear that the opioid epidemic in this country is a huge priority for him, something he is certainly very focused on tackling and something that I think was ignored by the previous administration that won’t go ignored in this one.”

35
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Not interrupting the flow of opioids. That man’s “thank you” to his supporters in the rust belt. Keep them stoned until they can vote again.

  2. something that I think was ignored by the previous administration that won’t go ignored in this one.

    I guess it’s one of those unwritten rules that every criticism directed by a GOP person at another GOP figure must contain, no matter how clumsily it has to be shoehorned in, a little squib of undeserved, unjustified criticism of the Obama administration. The very few people left in the GOP who try to say and do actually sane things occasionally all do this. Just a little homeopathic dose of Obama hatred to show your heart is still in the right place. Idiots.

  3. Supporters in the pharmaceutical industry no doubt.

  4. I assume you’ve heard of an ACTUAL study done correlating the high numbers of Rump voters with heroin/meth addicts in certain areas. At first, I thought it was some kind of joke. Nope.

    In addition to this, what exactly does Portman think he can do in retaliation to Rump transferring these funds to tax cuts to the 1%? The voters who made Rump viable in OH will probably be with him even if he cuts of addiction treatment for them. What’s Portman’s leverage?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

29 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for ajm Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for sysprog Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for nowarino Avatar for irasdad Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for twowolves Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for 62fender Avatar for edhedh Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for tiowally Avatar for coimmigrant Avatar for socalista Avatar for dannysgrandma Avatar for coprophagoussmile Avatar for carolson Avatar for catyoga Avatar for sensor

Continue Discussion