Obama: It’s ‘Not Acceptable’ For McConnell To Stall My SCOTUS Nom

President Barack Obama speaks about his Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, Thursday, April 7, 2016, at the University of Chicago Law School in Chicago. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

President Barack Obama railed against Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and other Senate leaders on Thursday for refusing to consider his Supreme Court nominee to replace late Justice Antonin Scalia.

Obama said during a town hall at the University of Chicago Law School that Senate Republicans’ refusal to consider D.C. Circuit Judge Merrick Garland for the high court was “unprecedented.”

Obama said he thought it was “perfectly acceptable” for Republicans not to appoint Garland based on disagreements on “important issues.”

“What’s not acceptable is not giving him a vote, not giving him a hearing, not meeting with him. What’s not acceptable, I believe, is the increasing use of the filibuster for someone who’s clearly within the mainstream,” Obama said. “Or to essentially say that we are gonna nullify the ability of the President who is from another party from making an appointment. And we’re gonna wait to maybe see we can get a guy from our party to make the appointment.”

“That is where you have a process foul that corrodes the ability of the court to function effectively,” Obama continued.

Many Republican senators have said they won’t meet with Garland, but there have been a handful of exceptions. McConnell has said that he would not meet with Garland or offer him a hearing.

Obama called Congress “throughly unproductive” and told the law students that the “sharp polarization” seen in the 2016 election cycle would seep into the judicial system if things didn’t change.

Obama walked the students through a scenario in which a Republican won the White House, but Democrats stalled on that Republican president’s nomination.

“If in fact Mitch McConnell sticks to not giving a hearing and not giving a vote and let’s say from their perspective, everything works out great, and their nominee, whoever that might be, wins and takes over the White House,” Obama hypothesized. “So now the Democrats say, ‘Well you know what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.’ We’ll wait four more years to see how the next president comes in. At which point Mitch McConnell will then eliminate the filibuster possibility for Supreme Court nominations as it was eliminated for the other judicial appointments.”

Obama said it would be a “disaster” for courts if there was a continued trend of different parties controlling the Senate and White House.

48
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Well said, Mr. President.

    Keep up the good work and keep using the bully pulpit.

    You’re great at it!

  2. Obama is 10000% correct. Still this guy is too conservative for my tastes.

  3. “nullify the ability of the President”

    Mr. President, they’ve been trying to do that to you since Inauguration Eve, 2007 2009 (thanks, @lestatdelc).

    Historians can answer whether other Administrations have faced such a level of obstruction as President Obama has. When I Googled the term “president congress obstruction” for dates up to 2007, I was amused to find this article in the LA Times:

    Although the Senate has confirmed most of Bush’s judicial nominees, 10 of his most controversial appointments stalled in the chamber last year, even though it was widely acknowledged that they would have commanded a majority vote for confirmation. They have since been renominated.

    Senate Republicans and the president have argued vociferously that judges deserve a simple “up-or-down” vote.

    “Senators ought to have the backbone and the gumption to get off their hind quarters and vote yes or vote no and be responsible for that vote with their constituents,” said Sen. George Allen (R-Va.).

    One more example of IOKIYAR.

  4. Yes. We. Can. Thank you, Mr. President! Continue speaking the truth!

  5. LOL…I can just imagine how angry this makes McConnell (and other GOPers/Teatrolls) behind closed doors when Obama levels patronizing chastisements at them like he’s an adult talking to children hahahaha…“not acceptable” haha…gives me fucking giggles…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

42 more replies

Participants

Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for david_e_brown Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for victorabrahamsen Avatar for mangifirek Avatar for jsfox Avatar for charliee Avatar for jep07 Avatar for mymy Avatar for leftflank Avatar for dswx Avatar for 600poundsofsin Avatar for fourlegsgood Avatar for mantan Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for breakingdeadmen Avatar for nocoolnamejim Avatar for darrtown Avatar for benthere Avatar for dmblum Avatar for meta Avatar for jdmagic Avatar for west_of_the_cascades Avatar for landshark2897

Continue Discussion