FBI Has Adequate Resources For Russia Probe, Acting Director Says

Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, left, next to CIA Director Mike Pompeo, listens as Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats testifies at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, May 11, 2017. It is an annual hearing about the major threats facing the U.S., but former FBI Director Jim Comey's sudden firing is certain to be a focus of questions. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, left, and CIA Director Mike Pompeo, center, listen as Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, May 11, 2017, during the Senate ... Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, left, and CIA Director Mike Pompeo, center, listen as Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, May 11, 2017, during the Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on worldwide threats. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) MORE LESS

In the wake of the ouster of FBI Director James Comey, several news outlets reported that Comey told both the Justice Department and senior members of Congress just days before he was fired that he needed more resources for the bureau’s investigation into alleged collaboration between the Trump campaign and the Russian government during the 2016 election.

However, Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee Thursday that he believes the bureau currently has the resources it needs to complete the investigation.

“I believe we have the adequate resources to do it and I know we have resourced that investigation adequately,” he said.

McCabe refused to confirm or deny reports that Comey had sought additional resources for the investigation just before he was sacked, but added that it would be unusual for the FBI to make such a request.

“We do not typically request resources for an individual case,” he said. “As I mentioned, I believe that the Russian investigation is adequately resourced.”

McCabe did emphasize that the Russia probe is a “highly significant investigation,” though, contradicting White House claims that it is “probably one of the smallest things” on the FBI’s “plate.”

6
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. The question that I would ask this fellow is:

    Is Trump under investigation by the FBI for criminal activities unrelated to Russia; issues involving cases of domestic fraud and malfeasance?

  2. This is a tell. He will not outright obstruct the investigation – he will leave it underfunded at the request of his benefactor Trump.

  3. Well, that’s a real fuckin’ surprise right there.

    I’m absolutely SHOCKED he’d say such things…

  4. I’m going to disagree, slightly.

    1. Instead of unequivocally issuing a statement, he used the (technically redundant) qualifier “I believe.”
    2. Because of the above point (and the timing of the inquiry), he can always ‘re-assess’ without losing face.
    3. He refused to comment on whether Comey asked for additional funds.

    While I wouldn’t stake my life on it, my read is that he’s basically stalling. The neutral wording staves off a Trumpquisition while simultaneously being easily retractable (given the circumstances) without damaging the legitimacy of the investigation.

    Possible motivations?

    • Maybe he’s giving the Deputy AG some breathing room due to friendship/loyalty/internal-code-of-conduct/advantage/olive-branch-for-redemption.
    • Maybe neither he nor Comey are sure how they want to play that particular chip.
    • Maybe he’s just giving himself some breathing room, since maybe he was blindsided by the firing since it is so painfully politically untenable to anyone not disabused of the notion that our elected officials have any shred of loyalty to the USA and the philosophical precepts of the founding fathers that are so frequently invoked.

    Granted, a lot of these conclusions are informed by my gut-level contrasting of his statements regarding the funds question vs. Comey’s reputation within the FBI. I feel like if he was more ‘Trump-clined,’ he would have been more reticent on that latter issue. Something like, “I’ve great respect for former director Comey, and while I haven’t heard any direct complaints, I can see how someone could come to that conclusion.”

  5. But gosh…Hugh Hewitt tried to tell us the other night that the FBI has 2000 more important investigations than the RUSSIAN one…doncha’ know.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for feathered_head Avatar for sysprog Avatar for johnbarleycorn Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for phillip

Continue Discussion