McCain: I’d Have Been ‘Reluctant’ To Start Iraq War If I Won In 2000

U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., criticizes the Obama administration during a Jackson, Miss., runoff rally in support of Republican U.S. Sen. Thad Cochran at the Mississippi War Memorial in Jackson, Miss., Monday, Jun... U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., criticizes the Obama administration during a Jackson, Miss., runoff rally in support of Republican U.S. Sen. Thad Cochran at the Mississippi War Memorial in Jackson, Miss., Monday, June 23, 2014. Cochran faces state Sen. Chris McDaniel, R-Ellisville, on Tuesday in a runoff for the GOP nomination for senate. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis) MORE LESS

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) said Thursday that he probably would have hesitated to send U.S. troops into Iraq if he had been elected President in 2000.

“You’ll find this surprising, but I think I would’ve been more reluctant to commit American troops,” McCain told CNN’s Jake Tapper and National Journal’s Ron Fournier at an event Thursday in Washington.

That does sound like a change of position in light of McCain’s vote to authorize the use of force in Iraq and his vocal support of the 2007 troop surge. McCain also criticized the Obama administration last month for not leaving behind a residual force in 2011 that could have deterred Islamist militants who were taking over key Iraqi cities.

“I think I would have (voted the same way), but I think I would have challenged the evidence with greater scrutiny,” McCain explained, as quoted by CNN. “I think that with my background with the military and knowledge of national security with these issues that I hope that I would have been able to see through the evidence that was presented at the time.”

The Arizona Republican added that he trusted the credibility of former Secretary of State Colin Powell at the time, although he now says evidence presented by the George W. Bush administration to justify invading Iraq was “flimsy.”

“But it’s obvious now, in retrospect, that Saddam Hussein – although he had used weapons of mass destruction – did not have the inventory that we seem to have evidence of,” he said, as quoted by CNN. “Which now looking back on it, with the benefit of hindsight, (the evidence) was very flimsy.”

78
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Perhaps McCain wouldn’t have ignored the ‘bin Laden determined to attack inside the US’ memo either. A McCain presidency would have also ushered in a new world peace and an energetic economy and magical unicorns would have been genetically engineered and given out to all 11 year old girls. Yes, a McCain presidency would have been the salvation of mankind.

    What a douchebag.

  2. Avatar for storm storm says:

    The evidence at the time was very flimsy. It was the implied ‘we can’t show you the good stuff’ that held up the stack of cards.

  3. Avatar for jsfox jsfox says:

    John went on to say: “Now Iran that’s a whole 'nother story . . .”

  4. And no doubt Jake Tapper and Ron Fournier slurped up every last drop of that McCain money shot. Good grief, what a perfectly Mavericky moment for our sycophantic media.

  5. Avatar for 8ball 8ball says:

    Everything looks like a nail to "The Hammer’ McCain.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

72 more replies

Participants

Avatar for jw1 Avatar for vinceandlinda Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for artemisia Avatar for avattoir Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for bluestatedon Avatar for thx1138 Avatar for labman57 Avatar for legion Avatar for kenstarr Avatar for storm Avatar for magical_panda Avatar for rbinnc Avatar for robcat2075 Avatar for 8ball Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for dsmith Avatar for reggid Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for mvstxr Avatar for lesmoor Avatar for STLcommentator

Continue Discussion