GOP Chair Defends Using Chart From Anti-Abortion Group At Hearing (VIDEO)

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

CNN host Wolf Blitzer on Wednesday quizzed House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) on the lengthy Planned Parenthood hearing he conducted on Wednesday.

Blitzer first asked Chaffetz about a chart from anti-abortion group Americans United For Life that the congressman used during the hearing. The chart reflects the number of abortions and cancer screenings provided by Planned Parenthood between 2006 and 2013. But the lines on the chart make it seem like the organization performs more abortions than cancer screening if one cannot see the numbers.

Chaffetz said he did not believe the chart was misleading.

“I stand by the numbers. I can understand where people would say the arrows went different directions, but the numbers are accurate. And that’s what we were trying to portray,” he told Blitzer.

The CNN host also asked why Chaffetz did not ask the anti-abortion group that released a series of sting videos targeting Planned Parenthood to testify at the hearing. The congressman said he did not want to interview the group until he had seen all of the footage they used for the videos.

When Blitzer asked why Chaffetz had Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards testify before the committee could review the videos, Chaffetz said, “Because it wasn’t a hearing about the videos. The hearing was about the funding of Planned Parenthood.”

Later, Blitzer said that about 75 percent of federal funding for Planned Parenthood is Medicaid reimbursements, prompting Chaffetz to tear into Planned Parenthood and the organization’s expenditures.

“You make it sound so sweet, but there are a lot of other things that they are doing with those: shared employees, shared assets, shared email lists that are engaged in these political activities,” he said. “They’re so flush with cash, they spent tens of millions of dollars over the course of years sending it overseas. When they’re buying first class air travel and chartering aircraft … it doesn’t really sound like all that money’s really going to help that poor young woman who’s looking for a little health care.”

Chaffetz explained that he wants the federal government to spend more money on cancer screenings, mentioning that his mother died of breast cancer. He then slammed Democrats who criticize his stance on Planned Parenthood.

“So don’t tell me that I don’t care about this when I lost my mother to this, when my dad died from cancer, when my wife works on this. There is a better way to do this… I am tired of getting lectures from these Democrats that try to say we don’t care about women. That is just absolutely offensive.”

Watch Blitzer’s interview with Chaffetz via CNN:

Latest Livewire
110
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. So, Congressman, you got nothin’.

  2. This Jewish-Mormon Patriarch waves a wire coat hanger around and screams that he’s the victim.

  3. Shorter Chaffetz: Oh yeah Blitz, it’s totes legit to use fake charts in congressional hearings!

  4. "I am tired of getting lectures from these Democrats that try to say we don’t care about women."
    

    Not half as tired as those Democrats are at having to give them. Why not try actually caring about women for a change, instead of waging full-scale war on them?

  5. This from a guy that was so derptastically inept he couldn’t get a job with the Secret Service.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

104 more replies

Participants

Avatar for ajm Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for sysprog Avatar for humpback Avatar for trippin Avatar for counter_coulter Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for wwss Avatar for inlabsitrust Avatar for boscobrown Avatar for mantan Avatar for frankly_my_dear Avatar for harry_r_sohl Avatar for ottnott Avatar for bobt54 Avatar for hjs62 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for jcblues Avatar for bd2999 Avatar for dnl Avatar for azjude Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah Avatar for niner

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: