Hillary Clinton said it was “his decision” if NSA leaker Edward Snowden ever returned to the United States to face any legal consequences for his actions.
The presumptive 2016 presidential frontrunner made the comments in an interview published Friday by The Guardian, the newspaper that broke many of the stories made possible by Snowden’s leak of classified information about NSA surveillance.
“If he wishes to return knowing he would be held accountable and also able to present a defense, that is his decision to make,” Clinton said.
“In any case that I’m aware of as a former lawyer, he has a right to mount a defense,” she continued. “And he certainly has a right to launch both a legal defence and a public defence, which can of course affect the legal defence.
She also argued that returning to the United States would allow Snowden to continue the “debate” he wished to start by leaking the information.
“Whether he chooses to return or not is up to him. He certainly can stay in Russia, apparently under Putin’s protection, for the rest of his life if that’s what he chooses,” she said. “But if he is serious about engaging in the debate then he could take the opportunity to come back and have that debate. But that’s his decision.”
“She also argued that returning to the United States would allow Snowden to continue the “debate” he wished to start by leaking the information.”
IMHO I think this has turned into something a little more than a debate.
Continued the “debate?” Is that how we treat those who commit espionage now? Oh, he didn’t really do much that was wrong, he was just trying to start a “debate.”
The Power Elite in this case want to prosecute Snowden but not any of the NSA principals or corporate execs who broke the law brazenly and with contempt, including those who lied under oath while testifying to Congress. Sauce for the goose is supposed to be sauce for the gander. But I’ll believe it when I see it.
I think you meant “sham trial”, Hillz.
Hillary Clinton accurately describes the American legal system.
Let’s see how controversial we can make this seem. Get to it, internet commenters!