GOP Rep: Dems Have No Proof A Clean Spending Bill Would Pass (VIDEO)

Idaho 1st District Congressman Raul Labrador talks at the Republican Party primary headquarters held at the Doubletree Riverside Hotel in Boise, Idaho on Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012 after winning his election bid.
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID) on Monday said Democrats have no evidence that a no-strings-attached spending bill would pass the House. 

CNN’s Anderson Cooper pressed Labrador to explain why a so-called “clean” continuing resolution to fund the government shouldn’t immediately be brought to a vote.

“You know, we could bring it to a vote and it would lose,” Labrador said on “AC360.” “And this is a beautiful talking point that the Democrats have, because it is something they have no evidence that there is anybody willing to vote for this bill.”

“Well why not bring it up and see?” Cooper asked.

“Why should we?” Labrador responded.

“Because that is how things work. Your job is to vote on things,” Cooper said.

Labrador then argued the media never asked House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to pass Republican policy reforms when she was speaker of the House, accusing Cooper of pushing against the Republican effort to defund the Democratic-backed Affordable Care Act. 

“This is the way it works in journalism,” Cooper said. “When you’re not on Fox News, you get contentious interviews. When you’re not on MSNBC and a liberal, you get contentious interviews. My job is to ask you questions different than you think.”

Cooper then suggested bringing the clean resolution to a vote would bolster Labrador’s argument if the bill ultimately failed.

“It’s not necessary,” Labrador concluded. “When you have a discharge petition, which under the rules of the House would force a vote on the House, not a single Republican has signed that discharge petition. So their talking points are null and void.”

[h/t Huffington Post]

Latest Livewire
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: