Democratic National Committee Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) said in a statement late Monday night that the Iowa caucuses were a “huge success” for Democrats, even though the race was too close to call.
Former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley dropped out of the race as the night went on, and preliminary caucus results showed rivals Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in a virtual tie.
Here’s Wasserman Schultz’s full statement:
Tonight was a huge success for Democrats, who gathered with their neighbors all across Iowa for a competitive race defined by voters’ enthusiasm and energy to send a strong message: we must keep America moving forward.
Primary season is officially underway, and based on tonight’s caucuses, it’s clear heading into New Hampshire that the Republican Party lost tonight. The top three Republican finishers in Iowa represent the far right – entirely out of touch with the vast majority of the American people.
Whether it’s because of Ted Cruz’s history as a government-shutdown ideologue, Marco Rubio’s rise on the back of the Tea Party, or Donald Trump’s deep dive into the mud of offensive rhetoric, the Republican Party of Lincoln and Reagan is unrecognizable.
Tonight’s caucus results have set the stage for a general election with a clear choice: a Democrat who will energize voters with a substantive message for growing the middle class and expanding opportunity so everyone has a fair shot, or a Republican doom-and-gloom candidate who promises to drag the country backward.”
“Primary season is officially underway, and based on tonight’s caucuses, it’s clear heading into New Hampshire that the Republican Party lost tonight. The top three Republican finishers in Iowa represent the far right – entirely out of touch with the vast majority of the American people.
Wasserman Schultz is calling this charade “a huge success for Democrats”?
Someone should point out to Little Debbie that Frothy the Dog-Man received more votes than all the Democratic candidates combined. Makes you wonder what she would consider an unmitigated disaster?
STFU and reign, you incompetent goob.
Even apart from everything else, suggesting that Reagan is some sort of aspirational figure should automatically disqualify someone from being DNC chair.
…which is what Charles will be told when Elizabeth II finally kicks
well, well… now it’s being reported that 90 democratic precincts didn’t have staffing assigned to count the votes… and are requesting the campaigns to provide staffers to do that work.