House Leaders Float Yet Another Plan To Break GOP Shutdown Fever Over Abortion

House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 29, 2015. An effort by a conservative Republican to strip Boehner of his position as the top House lea... House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, July 29, 2015. An effort by a conservative Republican to strip Boehner of his position as the top House leader is largely symbolic, but is a sign of discontent among the more conservative wing of the House GOP. On Tuesday, Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina, who was disciplined earlier this year by House leadership, filed a resolution to vacate the chair, an initial procedural step.(AP Photo/Susan Walsh) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

As the deadline to fund the government approaches, the House GOP leadership is floating a new plan that would allow members to rail against Planned Parenthood funding but avoid a government shutdown over the issue. The question is whether anti-abortion hardliners would sign on to a maneuver that has no chance of actually defunding the reproductive rights organization and wouldn’t guarantee the political fireworks of a shutdown.

The route being hinted at by the House GOP leadership team this week would keep the government open past the Sept. 30 deadline through a stop-gap spending measure. The so-called “clean continuing resolution” would keep government spending levels at their current levels (Planned Parenthood funding included). But then to appease the hardliners, the leadership would push through a separate budget measure under “reconciliation” rules which would defund Planned Parenthood separately and could not be filibustered in the Senate.

This plan, still under consideration but emerging as a real alternative, would achieve a much-desired conservative goal: force Obama to grapple with Planned Parenthood funding directly, by either signing or vetoing it. But it would not force Obama to chose between funding the government and funding Planned Parenthood, a catch-22 that conservatives have been eager to put him in for weeks, despite’s Obama assurance he would veto any legislation that defunded Planned Parenthood.

The idea was first raised publicly earlier this week by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), the House majority whip, who in a press conference Thursday called it “a method that can actually put a bill on President Obama’s desk with 51 votes in the Senate to stop this horrific practice.”

Unlike typical legislation — like the bill to place a year-long moratorium on Planned Parenthood funding the House is voting on this week — budget reconciliation measures do not require a 60-vote cloture motion to advance in the Senate, as along as the measure reduces the federal deficit. That means Senate Democrats could not filibuster a budget reconciliation measure targeting Planned Parenthood.

Leadership presented the move to members in a conference meeting Wednesday evening, Politico reported, and on Thursday House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) called using reconciliation to attack Planned Parenthood “a distinct possibility.”

The problem for Republicans is that Obama would still be able to veto the bill, and they lack the votes in the Senate to override the veto. So the question remains whether the conservatives railing for a shutdown would back a plan they know would ultimately fail.

“It would be premature for me to say I am going to vote for or against a measure that’s reconciliation,” said Rep. John Flemming (R-LA), who signed a letter opposing any spending bill that funds Planned Parenthood. “If reconciliation defunds Planned Parenthood, that’s a step in the right direction because at least it gets it on the president’s desk.”

According to Stan Collender, a federal budget expert and executive vice president at Qorvis MSL Group, leadership would probably need to push through the stopgap spending measure first, because the deadline to fund the government is shorter than the time it would take to put together a budget reconciliation measure. That means leadership would have to convince the recalcitrant members to back a spending resolution that includes Planned Parenthood on the condition the reconciliation measure attacking it would come later.

“Do you a vote for a continuing resolution with only a promise?” Collender said Thursday in an interview with TPM.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) expressed her own skepticism of the plan in a press conference Thursday.

“I’d be interested to see if they would take it to reconciliation knowing that we can sustain a veto, because they really want to shut down government,” she said.

Latest Livewire
32
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. This whole idea is as much a non-starter as de-funding or over-turning ACA, and for much the same reasons:

    A) The vast number of Americans support both programs.

    B) The foundations of the objections for both programs have been irrevocably determined to be without basis in fact.

    The GOP cannot afford another shutdown situation and neither of these issues (yes, I know ACA isn’t on the table, but you watch - they’ll slip something in on that, too) are anything the American people as a whole want Congress to waste time over.

    Which is precisely why we’re having this discussion - the American people don’t want it, so time and resources are being spent by a tone-deaf House of Reprehensibles.

  2. They really, really, really want the president to veto SOMETHING.

  3. Avatar for mantan mantan says:

    Interesting how the word ‘kabuki’ has moved from Washington metaphor to Capitol Hill reality…

  4. WHO KNows IF OHbuMMER will sIGN IT by ACCIdent if IT ReachEs his DESK? LIke MAYBe HE wasN"T PAYIng attention BECAUse THERE was A GOOD TIMES MARAthon on aND he wasN"T reading WHAT he was SIGNING. THEN, BAM, NO More PLAnned BABY abattoirs. US RepublicaNS iS SMARTEr THAN YOU LIBTURd LOosers11!1!one!!!

  5. That plan is too complicated for the teabaggers…

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

26 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for bdtex Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for mondfledermaus Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for humpback Avatar for JohnB Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for clemmers Avatar for becca656 Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for cvilledem Avatar for mantan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for ottnott Avatar for dnl Avatar for misterneutron Avatar for edhedh Avatar for bankerpup Avatar for mpower1952

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: