‘MeToo’ Leader Alyssa Milano Thinks Blasey Ford Hearing Could Have Different Ending Than Anita Hill’s

Attending the Brett Kavanaugh hearing as guest of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), actress and #MeToo movement leader Alyssa Milano recounted watching the 1991 Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill hearings and was hopeful that the scrutiny of the allegations against Kavanaugh brought by Christine Blasey Ford will end differently.

“I remember thinking what a horrible situation,” Milano said of the ‘91 hearings, which she watched as a 20-year-old. “It really was the foundation of my learning about what sex harassment was…I remember thinking what a strong, amazing solid woman she was.”

Milano traveled from Los Angeles to show “solidarity” and “support” for Blasey Ford, who’s accused Kavanaugh of groping her when they were both teenagers. Kavanaugh has denied the allegations.

“I think we’re in a different time, I think women are standing together in solidarity, more so than we were in ’91, and I think women throughout the country are not going to let it be what it was,” Milano said.

She said she was invited by Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, as soon as the hearing was initially scheduled. Milano said she had also reached out to Blasey Ford’s attorney “just to show my support and if she needed to speak or go for coffee, or anything, if I could help her in anyway , that I was here for her.”

“Anytime people are talking about issues of sex harrasment, assault and abuse, it helps,” Milano said, when asked if Blasey Ford’s allegations were helpful to the #MeToo movement.

4
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Well that does it! Orrin Hatch is having Clint Eastwood flown by supersonic jet to sit directly behind the left shoulder of Brett (I was a college Virgin) Kavanaugh.

  2. But Sen. Orrin Hatch, one of Bork’s biggest defenders, said that Bork would do “very well” in televised hearings, adding, “I think those who have been vilifying him are going to have to eat a lot of words.”

    Ran across this Vox.com piece on the Bork confirmation hearings.

    Jeebus but that was one creepy dude. Naturally, the GOP was enthralled by him and considered him a genius.

    Among his interpretations of the Constitution was that the First Amendment protections of speech only covered political speech. Genius, indeed.

  3. Yale Law School Prof.
    After GOP Attorney General Elliot Richardson resigned rather than fire Archibald Cox, Bork said, sure, I’ll fire him, what’s the big fucking problem?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ottnott Avatar for jacksonhts

Continue Discussion