Al Franken: Hard Not To Conclude That Sessions ‘Perjured Himself’

Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn. questions Attorney General-designate, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2017, during the committee's confirmation ... Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn. questions Attorney General-designate, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2017, during the committee's confirmation hearing for Sessions. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) MORE LESS

Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) said on Tuesday that he finds it hard not to conclude that Attorney General Jeff Sessions “perjured himself” during his Senate confirmation hearing.

“Listen, I’ve been cutting him a lot of slack. I’ve been refusing to say that he lied,” Franken told CNN’s Jake Tapper. “It’s hard to come to any other conclusion than that he just perjured himself.”

During his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in January, Sessions responded to a question Franken asked by saying that he “did not have communications with the Russians.”

Last Thursday, however, Sessions’ spokeswoman confirmed that he met before the election with Russia’s ambassador to the United States.

Franken said that he waited for Sessions’ letter on Monday night to the Senate Judiciary Committee to come out. In the letter, Session defended his responses under oath as “correct.”

“I did not mention communications I had had with the Russian Ambassador over the years because the question did not ask about them,” Sessions wrote.

“That’s a ridiculous response. It’s not a clarification at all. Of course the question didn’t ask about the Russian ambassador,” Franken told Tapper. “He answered a question that he asked himself, which is ‘did I meet with any Russians,’ and he answered it falsely. He said, ‘No, I hadn’t.'”

“You think he perjured himself. What do you think the penalty should be, do you think he should resign?” Tapper asked.

“I think he should come before the committee and explain this,” Franken said.

Franken previously called on Sunday for Sessions to come back before the committee to “answer some questions.”

“I don’t want to go there and definitively say we should be prosecuting the attorney general,” he said at the time. “But I think the attorney general owes it to the Judiciary Committee to come back and explain himself.”

59
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. So Clinton gets impeached for lying in a civil suit about a consensual affair, but Sesssions lying to Congress about meetings with hostile foreign powers is somehow OK?

  2. I’m hoping Franken can compel AG Shitstain to appear so he can question him and, for the coup de grâce, say: “One last question, Mr. Attorney General: When can we expect to see your resignation?”

  3. Always liked Franken (as Stuart Smalley, as an author of Lying Liars, as a strong, liberal midwestern Senator) but I’m just loving him in this role. Plain spoken, reasonable, intelligent. Don’t know if he wants it but I’d love to see him in the Oval office, or as Veep.

  4. Dear Sen. Franken:

    NO MERCY. NO QUARTER.

    Thank you,

    Sane Americans Everywhere

  5. Perp walk needed to resolve issue.
    Call media first set date and time.
    Use shiny gold plated handcuffs.
    Boy that would make my day.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

53 more replies

Participants

Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for epicurus Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for becca656 Avatar for inversion Avatar for chelsea530 Avatar for maxaroo Avatar for nymund Avatar for neal_anderthal Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for dickweed Avatar for pmnmt Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for tena Avatar for atrainedmonkey Avatar for edhedh Avatar for fresh_coffee Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for tiowally Avatar for cuwrs Avatar for timbo Avatar for littlecatfeet Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for drtv

Continue Discussion