5 Points On The Conservative Author Dishing Clinton Dirt To NYT and Fox News

Former President Bill Clinton, center, and daughter Chelsea Clinton, right, look on during a ceremonial swearing-in for Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Monday, Feb. 2, 2009, at the State Department in Wash... Former President Bill Clinton, center, and daughter Chelsea Clinton, right, look on during a ceremonial swearing-in for Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Monday, Feb. 2, 2009, at the State Department in Washington. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Just as Hillary Clinton announced her candidacy for President, Washington was already buzzing about the next great Clinton scandal.

The book on everyone’s mind was “Clinton Cash,” the latest offering from conservative author and activist Peter Schweizer. Set for release next month, Schweizer is marketing the book as a story of a corrupt dynasty, an expose of her family’s unsavory connections with foreign donors.

The New York Times reported on Sunday that it and other media outlets had cut deals with the conservative writer to access his research on the Clintons before the book was published. While many on the right appeared giddy, those in the pro-Clinton camp wasted no time slamming Schweizer as a Republican hack.

The terms of the deals are still opaque, and even the book’s harshest critics admit they have not read its conclusions. But Schweizer, president of the Government Accountability Institute and frequent Republican consultant, has a reputation and a body of work that may shed some light on his latest efforts.

Here are a few details, some lesser known, about the author of “Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.”

He’s A Self-Styled Conservative Corruption-Buster

Before “Clinton Cash,” Schweizer had already made a name for himself in conservative circles as a dogged investigator of government corruption. His previous two books also took aim at crooked politicians and the revolving doors in Washington, DC.

Schweizer railed against cronyism with a small-government populist bent in his 2011 book, “Throw Them All Out: How Politicians and Their Friends Get Rich off Insider Stock Tips, Land Deals, and Cronyism That Would Send the Rest of Us to Prison.” In 2013, he followed that up with, “Extortion: How Politicians Extract Your Money, Buy Votes, and Line Their Own Pockets.”

The former was taken seriously by some lawmakers for its investigation of insider trading by Congress. Former Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) cited Schweizer’s book in a hearing on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, calling “Throw Them All Out” a key resource in understanding insider trading.

His critics may have trouble painting him as totally partisan: The next target will reportedly be former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush (R). Schweizer told Bloomberg that he’s planning to release a book on Bush’s “cronyism” this summer.

He Had To Retract An Allegation Against A U.S. Senator

His 2011 book wasn’t an entirely clean shot. In fact, Schweizer later had to acknowledge and retract a substantial allegation against Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI).

Schweizer had suggested that Whitehouse gained inside trading info from top executive branch officials during a private session amid the 2007 financial crisis before going on to sell a mass of stock just before its value plummeted.

But an article in The Providence Journal, flagged by Media Matters on Monday, fisked Schweizer’s account and revealed that Whitehouse been absent from the committee that met with the officials. What’s more, Schweizer failed to report on publicly available information that could have informed Whitehouse on when to sell is stock.

Schweizer later said he had misfired and would not have taken a swipe at Whitehouse if he had had the facts right.

“No, I probably would not have mentioned him,” Schweizer told the Journal, and promised to correct the facts in his book.

He Once Warned That Disney Is Turning America Gay

Though he now brands himself as a specialist on fat cat politicians, a glance at Schweizer’s biography reveals that he was once a passionate soldier in the culture wars. But you wouldn’t know that from his website.

Schweizer’s site claims to list all his work, under the section “All Books,” but a couple pieces are missing from his shelf of small-government and pro-Reagan hagiography.

First is “Disney, The Mouse Betrayed: Greed, Corruption, and Children at Risk,” published in 1998.

In passages of the book reviewed by TPM, Schweizer argued that Disney World had become ground-zero for gay infiltration. Among the betrayals of Mickey Mouse, and traditional America, were rampant “gay activism,” cases of gay employees receiving special health benefits, and park performers dressing in drag. He also included an appendix titled, “Disney’s Pedophile Problem.”

An excerpt, describing one “cross dressing Minnie Mouse”:

Minnie Mouse is one of the most popular characters at Disney World. But inside that costume is one of the Magic Kingdom’s most bizarre secrets. At the new Disney, Minnie Mouse is often a man. ‘Because the costume is so small, the Mickey Mouse character is played by a girl since it usually only fits on a girl,’ says Spencer Craig, who worked at Disney World for almost twenty-five years.

Schweizer wrote with some urgency about the “gay subculture that is today blossoming at Disney.”

“It seems that some gay male employees at Disney World enjoy playing the feminine mouse, flirting with and comically embarrassing male guests,” he wrote.

He Also Co-Wrote A Book About Iranian Terror And Nukes

Meanwhile, “The Next War,” co-authored by former Reagan Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger, outlined a dystopic world in which rogue regimes and terrorists had won the day. The book, also unlisted on his site, was apparently pitching more aggressive global missile defense system.

An Amazon Review gives a flavor:

“[A]n Iranian-led jihad is unleashed throughout the Persian Gulf as fundamentalists rise up against secular Arab governments and organize terrorist strikes in the United States, while a nuclear weapon is detonated in Europe.”

His Institute Is Funded By The Kochs And Company

As Crooks and Liars pointed out, Schweizer’s Government Accountability Institute, a 501(c)(3), is funded by three conservative powerhouse donors.

First up would be the infamous Koch brothers, who contribute to most of GAI’s funding through the Franklin Center, a “free market” organization dedicated to “democratizing journalism.” Also in play is the Koch-run Donors’ Trust, a political “slush fund,” according to the blog.

From Crooks and Liars:

Of the total $2.2 million received in 2012, $2 million came from the Franklin Center, the Koch-funded “watchdog” organization. Perhaps coincidentally, the Franklin Center also received a $2 million contribution in 2012 from Donors’ Capital, the sister organization to Donors’ Trust.

Next is the Mercer Family Foundation, headed up by the eponymous hedge fund magnate Robert Mercer. As Crooks and Liars noted, Mercer’s main targets are usually congressmen trying to roll back the power of Wall Street. Mother Jones reported that Mercer is currently the top bankroller for Sen. Ted Cruz’s (R-TX) presidential campaign.

Latest Five Points

Notable Replies

  1. His [Schweizer’s] Institute Is Funded By The Kochs And Company.

    It’s time to say goodnight

  2. Of course Republicans are “giddy.” They always believe the next manufactured “scandal”
    will be the one to destroy all opposition and hand them eternal power. The fact that each one then fails to do so never alters their faith that the BIG ONE is coming along next. It’s right there, just out of reach, like the Michelle Obama “whitey” tape. And they’re “giddy” about each one as it comes along the endless pipeline.

    Oddly, I suspect that anyone who inclines to vote Democratic won’t decide to endorse the crazed platform of the GOP because they’re upset about unproven (and unprovable) accusations about charitable donations and speaking fees.

    If people want to talk influence peddling, how about the Kochs vowing to buy the election and own the next government? And of course, they own this “conservative author” too… even as the NYT obligingly propagandizes for them.

  3. O.K., so he’s a grifter, a charalatan and a tool. He might be fond of dogs.

  4. He was also a consultant to the speechwriter of George W. Bush.

  5. For those who want it all to be true, his credibility is irrelevant. For others, it’s more of an issue.

    It’s a “no smoke without fire” charge. Those who already believe the Clintons are evil profiteering liars will see these claims as “proof.” Those who don’t believe that will see it as politically motivated smears. Will a single vote be changed by such arguments? Doubtful.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

42 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajm Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for romath Avatar for pickwick Avatar for rationalleft Avatar for epicurus Avatar for chammy Avatar for nick1936 Avatar for rudesan Avatar for trumpdog Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for rssrai Avatar for jkrogman Avatar for monpa Avatar for darcy Avatar for jeffrey Avatar for jaybeeraybee Avatar for azjude Avatar for cpl593h Avatar for harcourt Avatar for whatithink Avatar for Texas_Sandman

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: