Opinions, Context & Ideas from the TPM Editors TPM Editor's Blog
To review quickly, Schumer argued that Dems should abandon the framework that's undergirded their negotiations with Republicans for months. Instead of agreeing to lower marginal tax rates in exchange for broadening the tax base, they should insist on kicking the marginal tax rates on high incomes up a notch, broaden the base by targeting tax expenditures that benefit top earners, and raise the tax rate on capital gains. Basically to push for significant revenue and to take it all from top earners.
His argument is that medium term deficits are too high to use the old Reagan formula and that broadening the base to pay for tax cuts for rich people will either leave no money left over to reduce budget deficits or require higher taxes on middle income earners or both.
The response from Democrats -- including those who've bought into the base-broadening, rate-lowering framework -- has been pretty quiet.
Congressional Republicans by contrast came out of autumn hibernation and charged right at Schumer for questioning the basis of the negotiations.
Mitch McConnell issued a scathing statement. So did John Boehner's office.
If I'm negotiating with Republicans, I see that response and I think two things -- two things, which, let's face it, should've been obvious from the outset: that reducing the deficit is a distant priority for Republicans, far, far behind lowering the top tax rate, and that Schumer's right -- I'm being had. Question now is whether Dems see it the same way.