Cameron Joseph contributed reporting.
Congress may have failed spectacularly to meet Saturday’s deadline for passing a bill to repeal Obamacare with only 50 votes, but Republicans are promising to keep the zombie effort lurching along into 2018—allowing it to cling to future reconciliation bills that GOP leaders had wanted to use as a vehicle for tax cuts.
Though the Senate budget unveiled Friday does not include provisions to allow for another Obamacare repeal vote, it would allow the Senate to continue to chip away at pieces of the law, such as the individual mandate.
Rank-and-file lawmakers are insisting, meanwhile, that more votes on full repeal are possible next year.
“The September 30th deadline is not a meaningful deadline. Budget reconciliation is available after September 30th,” Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) insisted, telling reporters last week that he and other Republicans will never stop trying to “keep the promise” of killing the Affordable Care Act.
“I think we should vote whenever we have 50 votes,” he said. “We don’t have them right now, it appears, but we should keep working and keep working until we reach consensus. Failure is not an option.”
Many Republicans expressed this same zeal, echoing President Trump’s questionable assertion that 50 senators would back a bill like the Graham-Cassidy block grant scheme if only they used a better process than the rush-job attempted in September.
But GOP leadership, perhaps knowing that there remains a fundamental divide over the substance of health care policy, is pleading with its members to leave the undead repeal effort in the ground and give their full attention to cutting taxes.
For days, they’ve been throwing cold water on the effort to drum up support for using the upcoming budget bill to pass both tax cuts and Obamacare, saying doing so would tank both goals.
“I personally think we need to take care of business on tax reform and not get distracted by other items, as tempting as that might be,” Senate Whip John Cornyn (R-TX) told reporters Friday. “The main thing I’m concerned about it is tax reform.”
Some members echoed leadership’s nervousness about imperiling the tax cut crusade by refusing to let Obamacare repeal stay dead.
“We couldn’t get health care done when all we were talking about for nine months was health care,” a usually mellow Sen. David Perdue (R-GA) fumed to TPM. “Tax is complicated. There are a lot of people who have disagreements.”
“That would be a pretty heavy lift [to do both],” Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) added. “The more you complicate legislation, typically, the more difficult it is to pass.”
Practically, Republicans can’t keep Obamacare repeal alive—they have wasted months trying several permutations and haven’t been able to muster even the 50 votes needed under reconciliation, let alone the 60 needed to pass a bill under the Senate’s normal rules. But politically, they can’t completely let it go either. Though repeal remains unpopular with the vast majority of the electorate, the GOP’s donor base will continue to demand it.
With no other major policy accomplishments to point to and with the success of tax reform in question, get ready for the repeal zombie to rear its head at least once a year for the foreseeable future.
“You can do it every year,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) emphasized last week, referring to future reconciliation bills. “You’ll have at least one shot every year that Republicans control the Senate.”
I find this wording interesting:
It used to be conventional wisdom that it was the teaparty base that demanded it. I know public sentiment has shifted since Trump became president, and the threat of losing the ACA became real. Is it possible that the GOP voting base no longer supports a straight up repeal? If so - that seems like a very, very big wedge that should start to be exploited - the sea of difference of goals between the GOP donor base vs. the GOP base. I don’t think the base realizes how large a sea that is.
No place is this more clear (the sea of difference) than in the current battle about to be waged on Tax Reform. But perhaps it is time to wed that to the Repeal efforts as well.
We have already seen Cory Gardner a) remind his fellow GOP senators that they have to deliver, or else… per the Donors - And Then back up - to say votes shouldn’t be based on the donors whims. First sign of a retreat because of the public attention … that maybe the base might start to see how badly they are being played?
It’s always been the donors. Sure, the base is agin anything the kenyan did, but they approve of pretty much everything about Obamacare except the name. The base can be riled up in specific directions pretty easily.
They just let CHIP expire, so at least they got to throw some people off health insurance, amirite?
If zombies eat brains, they will be sorely disappointed in Congress.
Yup. And crickets.