Will Red State Senate Dems Cave To Pressure To Replace Obamacare?

UNITED STATES - JUNE 21: Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) speaks during the press conference on bipartisan gun control legislation on Tuesday, June 21, 2016. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

When Republicans repeal major components of Obamacare in January, they are going to need Senate Democrats to help them replace it.

While incoming Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has been emphatic that Democrats won’t be helping Republicans pick up the pieces after Obamacare repeal, red state Senate Democrats are the ones who will decide the ultimate fate of Republicans’ repeal gamble.

As of now, Senate Democrats who will be running in states Trump easily won are holding the line.

“What’s the replace bill look like? You don’t know. They don’t know. There isn’t one so if they repeal Obamacare, they’ve got to explain to 700,000 Ohioans why they lost insurance, they’ve got to explain to seniors why they’re losing close to $1,000 a year on their drug benefits,” Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) said.

What about when Republicans start pressuring Democrats?

“They can pressure all they want. What does pressure mean? That they’re going to repeal and they say ‘fix it?'” Brown said. “They’re going to have to explain why they’re doing what they’re doing. My re-election has nothing to do with that.”

Senate Democrats in 2018 have one of their toughest maps in years. Up for re-election are senators in states like North Dakota, Montana, Indiana, Missouri and West Virginia – states that are solidly red. That does not include states like Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, where Trump’s surprise victories are making Democrats think twice about their home states’ politics.

On health care, however, red state Democrats may not be willing to budge. While helping Republicans come up with a replacement plan might show they’re flexible, bipartisan and putting their constituents ahead of politics, it also neutralizes what could become the best line of attack they could have against Republicans in the midterms if the GOP plan is either still not finished or is politically unpopular.

Right now, Republicans’ plan is to repeal Obamacare as soon as possible and then give themselves two or three years to transition away from it and onto an undetermined replace plan. Most experts TPM has spoken to that Republicans could do some pieces of a replacement plan through reconciliation – which requires only 51 Senate votes–but at the end of the day Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-TN), who chairs the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, has told TPM Democrats will need to come on board.

Health policy experts have warned that repealing Obamacare without a replacement could send the insurance market into a tailspin. The Urban Institute released a study Wednesday predicting that 30 million people could lose insurance. Health care experts across the board have warned that repealing the Affordable Care Act along with the individual mandate would lead to a large number of individuals pulling out of the market because they were no longer required to be insured. As a result, the only people left would be the sick who would experience major hikes in insurance premiums.

Republicans are counting on the fact that if the doomsday scenario comes true they will be able to pressure red state and swing state Democrats to come to the table and work on a bipartisan replacement.

“When that date came and you did nothing, if you want to play politics, I think the blame would go to people who didn’t want to do anything,” said House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) in a pen and pad with reporters earlier this month.

Democrats, however, view Republicans as the ones playing politics with the issue. After six years of being on the defensive about Obamacare, Democrats could find themselves in a position to criticize Republicans for failing on health care.

“Our position is you guys have had seven years since March of 2010 when you said you needed something else. You’re not willing to talk about a replacement yet?” said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA). “If they came to us and said we would like to talk to you about something, and we’ll call it replacement and you’ll call it reform, we would sit and talk, but if it starts with repeal, they’re telling us they don’t want us involved.”

Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) is considered one of the most vulnerable senators up for re-election in November 2018. Trump won her state by more than 35 percentage points. Heitkamp was vague when asked whether she’d sit down with Republicans and deal on Obamacare.

“What I plan on doing is making sure we don’t have chaos in health care,” Heitkamps aid.

One indication of where senators might land on Republican health care alternatives might lie in how they are responding already to changes Republicans plan to make on Medicare.

After House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) told Fox News that he was interested in privatizing Medicare, Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-IN) came out strongly against such an idea.

“I will oppose any effort to privatize Medicare or turn it into a voucher program in the future,” Donnelly said. “If my colleagues have pragmatic ideas that strengthen Medicare … count me in, but if they want to phase out Medicare, or privatize the system, count me out.”

Donnelly has also announced that he plans to vote against Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) to be the secretary of Health and Human Services because of Price’s support for Medicare privatization.

One red state Democrat Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) wouldn’t weigh in on what’s to come, but said she’s not confident Republicans will be worth working with if they continue to put repeal ahead of replace.

“You can’t repeal it until we know exactly what you’re going to replace it with and when that is going to go into effect,” McCaskill said.

Latest DC
129
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. ★·.·´¯·.·★ COMING SOON-- RepubNOcare ★·.·´¯·.·★

    with the extra feature ׺°”˜”°º× REAL Death Panels ׺°”˜”°º×

    no extra cost because you have no insurance anyway…

  2. The R party has had nearly 7 years to come up with a replacement for the ACA. Does anyone really believe they’ll come up with one now?

  3. Heitkamp and Tester are on the firing line, and I’m sure the GOP will come to them numerous offers they can’t refuse. One option, suggested here, is to roll over for the Unaffordable Care Act of 2017. Alternatively, they could announce that they’ll go along with any program that hits targets for performance and cost matching OECD averages. I mean, how hard can it be for Republicans to achieve average? The ACA, largely thanks to Max Baucus, doesn’t even do this, so, yes, they’re totally onboard with an Obamacare repeal if the successor does this. No other advanced country suggests citizens just die in the streets as we’ve seen here. We want a Compassionate Conservative solution that 1) delivers coverage for all at a cost of 10 % of GDP (down from the current 18%) , and 2) brings various measures like life expectancy, infant mortality, heart disease and diabetes rates to levels at or above the OECD average. As some of these cost savings come from robust public health care clinics, national Republicans may find themselves at odds in GOP states that have spent years tearing the cost-saving institutions apart.

  4. They will fold like a cheap suit.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

123 more replies

Participants

Avatar for k_in_va Avatar for austin_dave Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for charliee Avatar for butlerknights Avatar for silas1898 Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for turdburgler Avatar for thepsyker Avatar for rational Avatar for theyallstink16 Avatar for redraleigh Avatar for neal_anderthal Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for kwd101 Avatar for eddycollins Avatar for birdford Avatar for elcapitanphillipeanjou Avatar for kathya Avatar for steveharris

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: