Deputy AG Nom Won’t Commit To Naming Special Prosecutor For Russia Probe

Longtime federal prosecutor Rod Rosenstein arrives at the Senate Judiciary Committee for his confirmation hearing to be deputy attorney, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 7, 2017. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Longtime federal prosecutor Rod Rosenstein arrives at the Senate Judiciary Committee for his confirmation hearing to be deputy attorney, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, March 7, 2017. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Donald Trump’s nominee for deputy attorney general on Tuesday declined to commit to appointing a special prosecutor to lead any probe into Russian election interference, including into alleged links between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Since Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from any probe involving the Trump campaign, Rod Rosenstein, the U.S. Attorney in Maryland, would be tasked with leading such an investigation if confirmed. Democrats are pushing for Rosenstein to step aside from any probe into ties between Trump and his associates and Russia as well.

During his confirmation hearing, Rosenstein cautioned that he does not have enough information about the situation to determine whether his own recusal on such a probe would be appropriate. But he explained that he has no reason to believe he couldn’t handle the investigation himself, if there was one.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-IA), asked Rosenstein if he had any reason to believe that he could not handle an investigation from which Sessions had recused himself.

“Senator, I’m not aware of any,” Rosenstein replied before explaining that he is not familiar enough with the current situation at DOJ to make a determination about recusal from a probe into Russian election interference.

“I don’t know what, if any investigation is currently ongoing within the department. So if I were confirmed, I would need to familiarize myself with the facts, I would need to consult with experts in the department. We have a complex set of rules and statutes that govern recusals,” he said. “And so I’m not aware of any requirement for me to recuse at this time, but as a lawyer, Senator, I would have to know what it is I’m recusing from.”

Asked again by Grassley how he would decide when a special prosecutor would be appropriate, Rosenstein said it would be his job to make sure that any investigation would be carried out independently.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the committee’s ranking Democrat, later returned to the question of special counsel and asked Rosenstein if he would support one. In response, Rosenstein noted that the current acting deputy attorney general, Dana Boente, has not appointed any special prosecutor and explained that he was not in a position to “overrule” that decision.

Feinstein tried to clarify again whether the nominee supported appointing a special prosecutor.

“I’m simply not in a position to answer the question because I don’t know the information that they know, the folks that are in the position to make that decision,” Rosenstein replied.

Sen. Pat Leahy (D-VT) brought up the subject again in his questioning, prompting Rosenstein to offer that he was willing to appoint a special counsel “whenever I determine it is appropriate based upon the policies and procedures of the Justice Department.”

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), who has threatened to delay Rosenstein’s confirmation if he does not commit to appointing a special prosecutor, also quizzed the nominee on the matter.

Rosenstein told Blumenthal that he “should not be promising to take action on a particular case” before being confirmed to the post.

Rosenstein said at the top of the hearing in response to Grassley that he was not aware of any contact he’d had with Russian officials, and that he had not discussed the topic of presidential campaigns communicating with Russia with Sessions.

This post has been updated.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for osage osage says:

    The unbiased truth is not his objective. He’s just being a good little Republican and leaving the option of cover-up open and “plausibly” deniable.

  2. I do not like to ‘judge’ people on looks, etc. but the Trump Administration seems intent on finding people that ‘look the part’ of RWNJs to fill their posts. Stephen Miller, Carter Page, Jeff Sessions, etc. etc. THIS one just LOOKS scary. GOEBBELESQUE…

  3. Holy… Is it just me, or does that dude looks like an emotionless serial murderer in that picture?

  4. Avatar for tena tena says:

    Not just you - that’s exactly what he looks like - a soulless serial killer, a/k/a Nazi.

  5. This guy is actually quite respected and is known for being thoughtful and fair. I would not commit either if I were him. He is not saying he will but he is not saying he won’t and he is making clear that he needs the facts first. Imagine that!

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

19 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for rob_beatty_walters Avatar for silvrfox Avatar for sysprog Avatar for smiley Avatar for jloomis3 Avatar for sociosam Avatar for austinite Avatar for bluestatedon Avatar for trnc Avatar for osage Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for gr Avatar for go2goal Avatar for nymund Avatar for microtherion Avatar for hoagie Avatar for tena Avatar for mkposs Avatar for coprophagoussmile

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: