Pennsylvania Rolls Out Back-up Plan In Case SCOTUS Rules Against Obamacare

Tom Wolf candidate for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination in Pennsylvania, speaks with members of the media after he casts his ballot in state's primary election, Tuesday, May 20, 2014, in Mount Wolf, Pa. (AP Ph... Tom Wolf candidate for the Democratic gubernatorial nomination in Pennsylvania, speaks with members of the media after he casts his ballot in state's primary election, Tuesday, May 20, 2014, in Mount Wolf, Pa. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Pennsylvania became the first state Tuesday to publicly put in motion a back-up plan to protect its federal health insurance subsidies in the event the Supreme Court dismantles a key part of President Obama’s health care law.

Tuesday evening, Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf announced the state this week had submitted an application to the federal government to take over the state’s federal exchange. The move would allow Pennsylvania residents to continue to receive federal subsidies towards purchasing health insurance if subsidies on the federal exchange are invalidated by a ruling in the King v. Burwell case expected later this month.

Pennsylvania would also need the approval of its GOP-led legislature if it wanted to set up its own exchange.

“There is no reason to deal with it right now,” Steve Miskin, spokesman for the state’s House Republicans, told the Philadelphia Inquirer.

In the Supreme Court case, the challengers contend that federal subsidies for health insurance in the 37 states where the federal government runs the health care marketplaces are invalid because of a few words in the law that say the subsidies are available for participants in exchanges “established by the State.” If the Supreme Court rules in the challengers’ favor, some 6.4 million Americans — including an estimated 382,000 Pennsylvanians — who are participating in federally-run exchanges are expected to lose their subsidies, potentially wreaking havoc on the entire private health insurance system.

Only 13 states and the District of Columbia have set up their own exchanges, with resistance largely stemming from Republican objections to the law. While some states have quietly discussed what to do in the event that the Supreme Court strikes down the federal subsidies, Pennsylvania is the first state to publicly announce its plan to apply to take over its exchanges, according to the Hill. Wolf had previously sent a letter to the federal Department of Health and Human Services suggesting he would be pursuing that option.

The governor said in Tuesday’s statement that the application for the state to set up its own marketplace does not necessarily mean it will do so.

“However, the responsible thing to do is set up a plan to protect hundreds of thousands of people and I look forward to working with members of the legislature to advance this plan if necessary,” Wolf said.

Teresa Miller, the Pennsylvania’s acting insurance commissioner, told the Associated Press that there were other reasons, aside from the Supreme Court case, for the state to consider running its own marketplace in the place of the federal “one-size-fits-all” exchange. She said if the state got federal approval, it could have its own exchange up and running within weeks or a few months, well before the fall’s enrollment period.

The federal government could still shoulder some of the responsibilities, according to the AP report, but if it did, it is unclear whether Pennsylvania would still be protected from the potential effect of the Supreme Court’s ruling in King v. Burwell.

Latest DC
13
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for ched ched says:

    Not the first time I’ve been grateful that we kicked Tom Fracking Corbett to the curb.

  2. “There is no reason to deal with it right now,” Steve Miskin, spokesman for the state’s House Republicans, told the Philadelphia Inquirer.

    This is the kind of thinking America expects from Republican office holders! It’s the kind of thinking that made Iraq a beacon of freedom and stability for the whole Middle East, that honed FEMA into the efficient, effective instrument that we saw rushing into action after Katrina and the kind of thinking that has made Kansas a model for pro-business tax reform.

  3. It’s also why this probably won’t fly; it’s reliant upon a GOP legislature to approve the deal. In an election year.

  4. This is great haha…PA’s GOP/Teatrolls are now damned if they do, damned if they don’t lol. Check and mate.

    “It’s also why this probably won’t fly; it’s reliant upon a GOP legislature to approve the deal. In an election year.”

    Precisely. I’ll go out on a limb here and say that if the SCOTUS rules like the political hacks we think they are, then PA will have a Dem legislature after November 2016 because they now get to choose to either alienate their voters or motivate a bunch of people, who they screwed royally, to show up and vote.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

7 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for radicalcentrist Avatar for trippin Avatar for brutus1910 Avatar for soeasy Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for ched Avatar for sniffit Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for azjude Avatar for rickjones

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: