Obamacare’s Taxes On High-Earners Staying In New Senate Health Care Bill

UNITED STATES - MAY 10: Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, talks with reporters in the Capitol on May 10, 2017. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
UNITED STATES - MAY 10: Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, is interviewed in the Capitol about the firing of former FBI director James Comey on May 10, 2017. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call... UNITED STATES - MAY 10: Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, is interviewed in the Capitol about the firing of former FBI director James Comey on May 10, 2017. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

 

Top Senate Republicans have indicated that it’s likely that the Affordable Care Act taxes on high-earners that the initial GOP repeal bill eliminated would be be put back in the latest draft expected this week.

“Well, that’s the current discussion, ” Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), the No. 2 Senate Republican told reporters Tuesday afternoon, “that they will remain in there and the goal would be to provide more stability funds to help bring premiums down and more flexibility for the governors and legislators to deal with deductibles.”

The two taxes being kept are the 3.8 percent net investment tax and a 0.9 percent payroll Medicare tax for high earners. The repeal of Obamacare’s taxes on the health care industry is expected to live on in the new version of the legislation.

The Wall Street Journal first reported earlier Tuesday that the taxes were staying in the revised version of the Senate bill, the Better Care Reconciliation Act—which is slated for release on Thursday. Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), another member of the Senate GOP leadership, confirmed to Bloomberg Tuesday that those taxes would remain.

The initial version of the bill eliminated both taxes, with the repeal of the net investment tax going into effect retroactively. According to the Congressional Budget Office, repealing that tax cost the government more than $170 billion over the next decade—money Senate Republicans can now use to boost other provisions in their bill, like the stability fund and the credits for individual insurance. Some rank-and-file Republicans also raised concerns about the optics of cutting taxes for high earners.

It appears that the money saved by keeping the taxes will not go to softening the bill’s Medicaid cuts in any major way, which a number of Republicans were seeking in the latest round of negotiations.

Latest DC
28
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Trumpanzees flinging their crap to see what sticks.

  2. Avatar for meri meri says:

    I don’t see that as sticking, as it’s most of the reason these guys want it so bad in the first place.

  3. Avatar for zsak zsak says:

    They could, you know, just keep Obamacare. That would be easy.

  4. This is great, how Rs avoid talking about trumPPet, father and/or son. Cornyn on the repeal and replace bill should be ignored too.

    “Not right now,” Senator Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania said.

    “Talk to others about politics,” said Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, typically more willing than most Republicans to tweak the administration.

    “He’s a very nice young man,” Senator Orrin G. Hatch of Utah said of the president’s son, insisting that he was simply “very dedicated to his father” and suggesting that the controversy “could be way overblown.

    Back on Planet Earth the Democrats are saying

    Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, a member of the Intelligence Committee, argued that by Donald Trump Jr.’s own account of the meeting — or at least the latest one — “this was an attempt at collusion.”

    Senator Christopher S. Murphy of Connecticut said that for a long time, “we saw a lot of smoke but no fire. Now, he said, “you’re seeing fire.”

    Tim Kaine: “This is moving into perjury, false statements and even potentially treason.”

    Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, dismissed any defense that Donald Trump Jr. was simply being politically naïve in taking the meeting. “Lying is not a rookie mistake,”

  5. So, what’s the point of ramming this thing through at all if they’re not even getting their rich people tax cuts? Are there any senators who are going to like this bill now?

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

22 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for dalinker Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for daveminnj Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for meri Avatar for wordtoyamamma Avatar for dave48 Avatar for ottnott Avatar for careysub Avatar for williamv Avatar for darrtown Avatar for cincypix Avatar for massie Avatar for gusfabriani Avatar for rickjones Avatar for not_so_fluffy Avatar for grack Avatar for zsak Avatar for maximus Avatar for qwerty23 Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for jakebarnes Avatar for donkey_sauce

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: