Despite Guv’s Veto, N.C. Weighs Passing ‘Religious Freedom’ Bill

CORRECTS ID'S ALEXIS LEONARD, LEFT, AND CHELSEA BERESFORD, NOT JUDY RANDOLPH AND SUSAN WILSON - Alexis Leonard, left, and Chelsea Beresford, right, smile after applying for a marriage license at the Buncombe County R... CORRECTS ID'S ALEXIS LEONARD, LEFT, AND CHELSEA BERESFORD, NOT JUDY RANDOLPH AND SUSAN WILSON - Alexis Leonard, left, and Chelsea Beresford, right, smile after applying for a marriage license at the Buncombe County Register of Deeds office in Asheville, N.C., Tuesday, Oct. 15, 2013. Reisinger accepted the marriage license request and said he will send it to the office of North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper. Reisinger says he thinks the state's ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional. (AP Photo/Adam Jennings) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

North Carolina state lawmakers are not letting their governor’s veto of a “religious freedom” bill stop them from trying to push through the controversial proposal, which would let local authorities opt out of officiating same-sex marriages. The North Carolina House will be back in session Monday evening to potentially vote on Senate Bill 2, which Republican Governor Pat McCrory previously vetoed out of constitutional concerns. Last week, the state’s Republican-led Senate — by a 32 to 16 vote — did its part to override his veto, which requires a three-fifths majority in both chambers.

Like similar legislation in Indiana and Arkansas, the proposal is drawing the condemnation of civil rights groups and the business community for appearing to undermine same-sex marriage, which became legal in the state last fall and could be expanded nationwide pending an upcoming Supreme Court ruling.

Critics say North Carolina’s proposal is actually much broader, because unlike the Indiana legislation, it does not weigh officials’ religious objections against “compelling governmental interests.” Furthermore, as a possible attempt to skirt legal challenges, the bill does not name religious objections to gay couples specifically, but says officials can recuse themselves from “all lawful marriages,” if they have “any sincerely held religious objection,” which critics say opens the door to discrimination against all sorts of couples, not just gay ones.

The legislation applies to magistrates, who perform civil ceremonies, and reigsters of deeds, who grant marriage licenses. Those who wish to opt out of performing a marriage on religious grounds have to recuse themselves from their marriage duties for at lease six months.

“Religious freedom is a fundamental right guaranteed under our state and federal constitutions—and one that our state’s public servants shouldn’t have to leave at the door,” the bill’s sponsor, Republican state Senate Leader Phil Berger, said in a press release earlier this month.

While McCrory said he believes “marriage is between a man and a woman,” he said in his veto statement that “no public official who voluntarily swears to support and defend the Constitution and to discharge all duties of their office should be exempt from upholding that oath.”

The North Carolina House, also Republican-led, will be back in session Monday evening to weigh whether to buck McCrory’s opposition to the legislation. However, their session does not end until the fall, MSNBC reports, giving them weeks to make their next move.

House Speaker Tim Moore told the Associated Press last week he would not advance the override measure until he secured a voter count. According to the Washington Blade, its fate is unclear as 10 House members did not vote when the chamber previously voted to pass the legislation.

“We remain grateful for the governor’s veto and we look to the North Carolina House to do the right thing and stand by his decision,” Equality North Carolina Executive Director Chris Sgro said in a release.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Way to go, NC legislators. It takes a herculean effort to be more of a collective dick than Pat McCrory.

  2. “Those who wish to opt out of performing a marriage on religious grounds have to recuse themselves from their marriage duties for at lease six months.”

    So, gay couples tour the state applying for licenses. They get turned down, and the party refusing the license gives licenses to no one else for six months. I'd say a few gay couples could put the act of marriage out of business in most of NC if they chose to. Sounds like a plan to me.
  3. Only in wackoland would this have a change of passing or being upheld. If a magistrate has the religious freedom to decline performing a ceremony, under what principle can the State preclude him from performing other ceremonies?

    The WashPost has an article today on how Sesame Street has resulted in many pre-schoolers being prepared for school. The show was likely banned in North Carolina.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for george_c Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for carlosfiance

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: