GOP Heads Off Major Internal Fight Over Medicaid Expansion … For Now

UNITED STATES - JULY 16: Rep. Mark Walker, R-N.C., participates in the Republican Study Committee news conference to "call on the House and Senate to support the First Amendment Defense Act" on Thursday, July 16, 201... UNITED STATES - JULY 16: Rep. Mark Walker, R-N.C., participates in the Republican Study Committee news conference to "call on the House and Senate to support the First Amendment Defense Act" on Thursday, July 16, 2015. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Republicans pushing for passage of GOP leadership’s Obamacare replacement bill were able to head off a major intra-party fight over how the legislation handled Medicaid expansion — at least for now, as supporters of phasing out expansion even sooner than the current bill withdrew an amendment to that effect Thursday.

Under the leadership’s bill, the American Health Care Act, Medicaid expansion would be allowed to continue until the end of 2019, at which point enrollment would be frozen, with the expectation that the program would wither away on its own. Conservatives are pushing for that deadline to come sooner, and Wednesday, during the mark up of the AHCA in the Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) introduced an amendment that would have frozen the program at the end of 2017. By Thursday morning, as criticisms of the idea from expansion state Republicans began to rack up, the amendment had been withdrawn and the bill passed by the committee with its expansion provisions as is.

“The challenge is, is you’ve got a diverse set of stakeholders, you’ve got moderate senators, you’ve got conservative folks like me in the House, and then you have the governors, you’ve got to keep them on board,” said Rep. Bill Flores (R-TX), an Energy and Commerce committee member who is supportive of moving forward the year expansion would freeze from 2020 to 2018.

“That would have spooked the governors,” he told TPM, adding that “if we convince the governors it’s OK,” that it could come back later in the process.

Before it was withdrawn, it had earned the endorsement of the Republican Study Committee, a group a of 170-or-so conservative member whose chair Rep. Mark Walker (R-NC) (pictured) has been very critical of the leadership’s legislation. Thursday afternoon Walker said “we’re still trying to get there,” when asked about the fate of expansion amendment and a seperate proposal to impose work requirements on certain Medicaid enrollees that the RSC also endorsed.

According to Axios, Barton said that President Trump’s administration is also “looking at it,” and that he has received “considerable amount of positive feedback” in discussions about it.

The amendment could be introduced again later on in the process, perhaps in the Rules Committee, which will mark up the legislation after it’s passed out of the Budget Committee, or on the House floor, depending on how the bill comes up for a vote.

But adding the provision would risk the objection of Republicans, particularly in the Senate, who represent expansion states.

“I think you’re going backwards,” Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), whose state expanded Medicaid, told reporters Thursday morning. “When you go backwards I think it makes it more difficult [for the Senate to pass the bill].”

And it even might run into the problems in the House, where the more centrist members — who have largely been out of the spotlight while conservatives revolted against the bill — were also vocally raising concerns.

“Taking this Medicaid window back from 2020 to 2018, that’s going to big problem for those of us in the expansion states,” said Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA), co-chair of the moderate Tuesday group.

Latest DC
9
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Hey Republicans you think you’ve headed off trouble now just wait.
    And as for your opposition to things being “jammed down throats” what’s the benefit of putting off to tomorrow the things you should do today, wink, wink nudge, nudge? You are still going to screw over all those nice white, mostly rural folks, that re-elected you and elected Trump.

  2. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    What do they think will get those republican governors on board with an earlier date? Maybe denying the vote to anyone making less than 4x the poverty line?

  3. Damn should have bought stock in knee pads and handkerchiefs.
    Snooze you lose I guess.

  4. Well, of course they are going to try and put off a majority of the pain until after the 2020 elections. That way their useful idiots will vote for them in the last critical redistricting that the Republicans will ever be viable in.

  5. Wow. Some knucklehead from Texas is willing to go on record saying that House members are going to ‘convince’ R governors in expansion states on what’s best for them? Watch out son, that’s John Kasich’s coffee mug coming at your head.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

3 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for stoy Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for lastroth Avatar for isepick Avatar for greysea Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for freddyrun

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: