NH GOP Never Intended Anti-Shaheen Op-Ed By Dead Lawmaker To Run

New Hampshire Senate candidate Scott Brown, left, stands with Mitt Romney, the former Republican presidential nominee, as they wait to be introduced during a campaign stop at a farm in Stratham, N.H., Wednesday, July... New Hampshire Senate candidate Scott Brown, left, stands with Mitt Romney, the former Republican presidential nominee, as they wait to be introduced during a campaign stop at a farm in Stratham, N.H., Wednesday, July 2, 2014. Brown, who is facing incumbent Democrat U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, was endorsed by Romney at the event. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The New Hampshire Republican Party said on Monday that an op-ed published by the late former House Speaker Marshall Cobleigh attacking Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) was not supposed to have been republished.

As TPM noted earlier on Monday, Foster’s Daily Democrat in New Hampshire republished an op-ed by the late Speaker Cobleigh, who died in 2009. In a statement the New Hampshire GOP said that it was republished by mistake. The op-ed was meant to refute an exchange between Shaheen and former Sen. Scott Brown, now the Republican nominee for Senate in New Hampshire, during a recent debate.

Here’s the full statement, from New Hampshire GOP spokeswoman Lauren Zelt:

During last week’s NBC News/ New England Cable News debate, Jeanne Shaheen lied to New Hampshire about her long history of opposing nuclear power. In the 1980s, Shaheen was a fierce opponent of New Hampshire’s Seabrook Nuclear Plant and frequently debated former House Speaker Marshall Cobleigh on local television about this issue. To highlight Shaheen’s blatant lies about her anti-nuclear power activism, the New Hampshire GOP circulated clips of Speaker Cobleigh’s television appearances and his 2008 op-ed after the debate.

We did not intend for this op-ed to be republished and clearly listed the original date of publication and mentioned that Marshall had passed away. But we’re sure that somewhere Marshall Cobleigh is looking down and laughing at the fact that he had once last chance to debunk the lies of his old nuclear power nemesis.

TPM reached Buzz Dietterle, the opinion page editor for the New Hampshire newspaper, before the New Hampshire GOP released its statement. Dietterle referred questions about why the op-ed was submitted to the New Hampshire GOP.

TPM asked Dietterle if republishing an op-ed like this was a first-time thing for the paper. He said he couldn’t remember off the top of his head but he suspected the paper had republished pieces by Meldrim Thomson, a former Republican governor of New Hampshire.

“I don’t know if it’s a first time thing. I almost want to say that —and I can’t swear to this — but I almost want to say that some of Meldrim Thomson’s stuff was resurrected after he passed but that’s stretching memories a little bit because that goes back to three or four decades ago,” Dietterle said.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Ah yes, the typical excuse of the toddler party, “don’t look at us because Johnny did it”.

  2. Avatar for oldvet oldvet says:

    Just a mistake, like the 40,000 voter registrations that have somehow “disappeared” in Georgia.

  3. Avatar for dnl dnl says:

    “oops”

  4. One week till the election.
    That means its DIRTY TRICKS TIME for the GOP.
    Not enough time to investigate and affix blame, plenty of time for the GOPers to “oops, it was an INTERN that did it”, or the ever popular: “We are very, very sorry that we got caught doing xyz.” to the “We don’t know who ran this ad that completely supports every single thing we do, honest. Would we lie?”
    Expect a blizzard of “Issue Ads” from groups no one has ever heard of and no one will ever see again. Groups that only pop-up in the last week of the election cycle and then disappear in a puff of 501©/504© filings. You will never, ever figure out where the money came from (but we know better. KOCH ‘cough’ KOCH.)

  5. Avatar for dwward dwward says:

    Forget the ‘re-publishing’ thing. That’s just a red herring. Why would you publish anything written by the chair of either party or other overt partisan that is nothing more than an attack on an opponent the only purpose for which is free political advertising?

    It’s completely unethical.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

1 more reply

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for dwward Avatar for oldvet Avatar for texasellen Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for dnl Avatar for sashasmom

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: