Can Under-Polled Hispanics Pull Out A Win For Mark Udall In Colorado?

U.S. Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., greets supporters at a campaign rally for his re-election bid in downtown Denver on Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2014. Udall was heading in to a local television station take part in a debate ag... U.S. Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., greets supporters at a campaign rally for his re-election bid in downtown Denver on Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2014. Udall was heading in to a local television station take part in a debate against Republican challenger U.S. Rep. Cory Gardner. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The polling looks pretty grim for Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO). If you take out explicitly Democratic-leaning polls, he hasn’t led in any poll since the beginning of October. Udall’s campaign believes they can beat the odds by recreating the strategy that led to an unexpected Senate victory in Colorado in 2010.

A big part of that is appealing to women. But another crucial piece is turning out Hispanic voters — and one Latino pollster told BuzzFeed on Tuesday that there is some evidence that the polls are underestimating Hispanic support for Udall.

And now one Udall-aligned group has made a significant TV buy for Spanish-language spots with early voting underway and less than two weeks to go until Election Day.

The Service Employees International Union purchased nearly $240,000 on Tuesday, according to the group’s filings with the Federal Election Commission, and released two new Spanish-language spots.

The ads hit Udall’s Republican challenger, Rep. Cory Gardner (R-CO), for blocking immigration reform, voting to deport DREAMers and cutting funding for education.

Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), whose winning 2010 strategy Udall has tried to emulate, won Hispanic voters by a 2-to-1 margin. Matt Barreto, co-founder of the Latino Decisions polling firm, told BuzzFeed Tuesday that the public polling seems to be off in gauging the Hispanic vote.

He pointed particularly to an Oct. 13 Denver Post poll that showed Gardner winning Latinos, 49 percent to 35 percent. Barreto said that polls conducted only in English fail to capture the true complexion of the Hispanic vote and Spanish-language polls find more robust support for Udall.

“The mainstream polls are just plain wrong in their Latino samples,” Barreto said. “Even if you give other polls the benefit of the doubt and assume the rest of their statewide numbers are correct — if you pull their Latino numbers out and put ours in — instead of Udall being down by 3, he’s up 3 to 4.”

But others worried that Udall’s campaign hasn’t paid adequate attention to the Hispanic electorate — which might help explain the major final-weeks ad buys for Spanish-language ads by SEIU.

“He’s made the campaign mainly about women and hasn’t done a very good job of connecting with and communicating to Latino immigrant voters,” immigration activist Frank Sharry told BuzzFeed. “He’s clearly better than Gardner on immigration, but he hasn’t taken full advantage of it.”

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. If you’re banking on an anomaly in sampling, you’re in pretty poor shape and you know it.

  2. The polls, even PPP, predicted Buck ® would win CO Senate seat in 2010. They were all wrong. Bennett (D) won the race.

  3. That’s not what they are banking on; they are banking on the pollsters using lousy models to predict who will vote. And the data suggests the models are not very good.

  4. I sure hope so. But it doesn’t convey an aura of confidence is what I guess I’m trying to say.

  5. No, that’s really not what Udall is banking on. He’s doing the same thing that Bennett did four years ago but I still think he is paying too much attention to women and not including Hispaics as much as he should.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for radicalcentrist Avatar for fargo116 Avatar for captaincommonsense Avatar for barbara63

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: