These 2 House Republicans Will Vote Against Bill To Deport Dreamers

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., right, and Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Fla., join Venezuelan-Americans gathered on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, May 9, 2014, to pressure the Obama administration to implement ... Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., right, and Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Fla., join Venezuelan-Americans gathered on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, May 9, 2014, to pressure the Obama administration to implement sanctions on the regime of Nicolas Maduro, the president of Venezuela. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

At least two House Republicans intend to vote against a GOP bill on Friday to forbid legal status for anyone present in the U.S. illegally, including young people brought by their parents as children who have been granted temporary relief.

In separate interviews in the Capitol, Florida Reps. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Mario Díaz-Balart told TPM they’ll vote against the bill.

“I’m in favor of the Dreamers because I think they’ve been positive for our country,” Ros-Lehtinen said.

Díaz-Balart and Ros-Lehtinen are perhaps the two most outspoken pro-reform members of the GOP conference. Both hail from heavily Hispanic districts.

The two Republicans said they would vote for the border funding legislation, though, which will come up first. Both of them defended their colleagues who want to vote to deport Dreamers.

“I think many in our conference have long been frustrated with the president’s use of executive powers but with bestowing or not bestowing immigration status for certain groups. And I don’t see this as anything other than a manifestation of that frustration,” Ros-Lehtinen said.

Díaz-Balart said: “You know, people can vote however they want.”

The legislation, offered by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), would end the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, set up in 2012 to grant temporary work authorization for qualified young people who have lived in the U.S. since June 15, 2007. It would gradually strip the legal status for existing beneficiaries and prohibit the executive branch from permitting anyone else to gain such a benefit.

Latest DC
4
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. They are both probably afraid that a court would find the rule applies to Cubans.

  2. Good to see that the GOP has finally been able to agree on exactly how much poison to put in the pill.

  3. Much like Log Cabin Republicans, Hispanic members of the GOP caucus are a puzzlement. The GOP makes no bones about their hatred of gays and brown people. Why they want to hang with pols who kick them in the teeth with poisonous diatribes and party planks seems so self-defeating.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for jonwisby Avatar for DelrayDame Avatar for antisachetdethe

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: