Trump Admin Defends ‘Voter Fraud’ Probe In Court Against Privacy Lawsuit

President-elect Donald Trump greets Kansas Secretary of State, Kris Kobach, as he arrive at the Trump National Golf Club Bedminster clubhouse, Sunday, Nov. 20, 2016, in Bedminster, N.J. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A federal court heard arguments Friday in a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s demand from all 50 states for sensitive voter information, including addresses, Social Security numbers and party affiliation data.

Over the July 4 holiday weekend, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) sued the leaders of the dubious “election integrity” commission—Vice President Mike Pence and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach—saying they had committed “egregious security blunders” that “would enable identity theft and financial fraud.” They’re demanding that the commission’s data collection efforts be immediately halted.

Already, the vast majority of states have resisted the commission’s inquiry, with at least 44 states refusing to hand over some of the information requested. In court on Friday, an attorney for the Justice Department admitted that only one state, Arkansas, has sent its voter information to the federal government thus far.

EPIC’s attorneys argued, for their part, that the commission is violating the E-Government Act of 2002, which government agencies to conduct a privacy impact assessment before collecting personal information using information technology. No assessment was conducted before requesting voter data, the suit alleges. The DOJ lawyer responded that because the “election integrity” commission is not an official government agency, it does not have to abide by these rules.

EPIC also raised concerns that the site the commission has set up to receive sensitive voter information is hosted by the Pentagon, with a .mil web address.

After hearing both sides make their case on Friday afternoon,US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly said she would issue a written opinion in the coming days.

Latest DC
56
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    I hope the Judge asks them the basis for needing this information as none exists.

  2. The DOJ lawyer responded that because the “election integrity” commission is not an official government agency, it does not have to abide by these rules.

    If they aren’t “official,” they should be shut down, then.

  3. Kobach has already all but acknowleged he needs it for some sketchy electoral campaign of his, no??

  4. Pretty sickening, the synergy between a party that systematically suppresses votes and a President mentally ill enough to believe massive voter fraud robbed him of a popular-vote victory. I don’t think any of us watching Barack’s inaugural in 2009 imagined we’d have slid back quite this far. Just got to slog on though. Hope the courts can mostly bat this thing down. Happy Saturday, everyone. :unamused:

  5. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    And why is a Pentagon website hosting this information? Trump’s “black helicopter” friends won’t be happy.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

50 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for fess Avatar for lockheedkeynesian Avatar for pluckyinky Avatar for overreach_this Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for feathered_head Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for asanders91360 Avatar for blandsten Avatar for mikem42 Avatar for leftflank Avatar for oscarhomolka Avatar for commiedearest Avatar for losamigos Avatar for wanderer Avatar for borisjimbo Avatar for longtimeobserver Avatar for pshah Avatar for tena Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for katscherger Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for the_loan_arranger

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: