Did Kellyanne Conway’s Roy Moore Comments Violate Federal Ethics Law?

Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway stands before President Donald Trump speaks in the East Room of the White House, Wednesday, July 26, 2017, in Washington. Trump is announcing the first U.S. assembly plant for electronics giant Foxconn in a project that's expected to result in billions of dollars in investment in the state and create thousands of jobs. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway stands before President Donald Trump speaks in the East Room of the White House, Wednesday, July 26, 2017, in Washington. Trump is announcing the first U.S. assembly plant ... Counselor to the President Kellyanne Conway stands before President Donald Trump speaks in the East Room of the White House, Wednesday, July 26, 2017, in Washington. Trump is announcing the first U.S. assembly plant for electronics giant Foxconn in a project that's expected to result in billions of dollars in investment in the state and create thousands of jobs. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

White House counselor Kellyanne Conway is once again in hot water for a remark made in a TV interview.

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel confirmed it is opening an investigation into a possible Hatch Act violation by Conway after she weighed in on the Alabama Senate race in an interview with Fox News.

In that interview, Conway attacked Democratic candidate Doug Jones as “weak on crime,” “weak on borders,” and “terrible for property owners.” Asked if she supported Roy Moore, who has been accused of pursuing and assaulting multiple underage girls several decades ago, she refused to answer directly, but suggested she wanted the Republican candidate to prevail. “We want the votes in the Senate to get this tax bill through,” she said.

According to Walter Shaub, the former head of the Office of Government Ethics, these statements violate the Hatch Act, a federal ethics laws that prohibits current administration officials from endorsing political candidates in their official capacity.

Shaub, who quit this summer, saying he could not do his job under an administration so unwilling to address ethical concerns, noted this week that Conway conducted the interview on the White House lawn and using her official title. He has filed a formal complaint about the incident with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel on behalf of the watchdog organization Campaign Legal Center, which he joined earlier this year.

In his request for a Special Counsel investigation, obtained by TPM, Shaub wrote: “Ms. Conway’s remarks were an obvious attempt to influence the election by convincing the public that voting for Roy Moore would jeopardize passage of the tax plan the President endorsed. The unmistakable message of her remarks was: Don’t vote for Doug Jones.”

The White House has denied Conway committed any violation.

“Ms. Conway did not advocate for or against the election of a candidate, and specifically declined to encourage Alabamans to vote a certain way,” White House spokesman Raj Shah said in a statement to Politico. “She was speaking about issues and her support for the president’s agenda. This election is for the people of Alabama to decide.”

Such ethical accusations are nothing new to the Trump administration.

Conway was investigated in February for using a TV interview to promote Ivanka Trump’s products. The Office of Special Counsel found Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley guilty of violating the Hatch Act for retweeting President Donald Trump’s endorsement of South Carolina congressional candidate Ralph Norman. White House social media director Dan Scavino violated the Hatch Act by urging followers of his official account to defeat Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) in a primary.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Violation of an ethical human being … more like it —

  2. Indeed, Kellyanne violated The Hatch Act and Senator Orrin Hatch should be outraged at her unlawful actions!

    I’m totally startled that Sen Orrin Hatch has not been more vocal against Kellyanne.

  3. Avatar for topcat topcat says:

    Cousin It certainly violated all decency.

  4. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    I just looked up the consequences of violating the Hatch Act. Apparently it goes to an entity called the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). And, sure enough, they lack sufficient members to reach a quorum, so have basically been gutted.

    In other words, nothing happens to Ms. Conway, but it’s still nice to lay down markers. People years from now should know who the villains were.

  5. I’m sure she’ll get a sternly worded memo from the WH Counsel instructing her to not do that again. Meh.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

86 more replies

Participants

Avatar for jootjoint Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for epicurus Avatar for jimtoday Avatar for gr Avatar for obsessed Avatar for nymund Avatar for georgesalt Avatar for darrtown Avatar for pshah Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for klw57 Avatar for dommyluc Avatar for antisachetdethe Avatar for remy Avatar for alana Avatar for j_publicus Avatar for edys Avatar for drtv Avatar for gromilini Avatar for ohcomeonnow Avatar for karlwlewis Avatar for 7hom7hom Avatar for brissy

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: