GOP Plots Response If SCOTUS Strips Obamacare Subsidies From Millions

House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, left, joined by House Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., takes reporters' questions, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, as House Republicans s... House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, left, joined by House Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., takes reporters' questions, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, as House Republicans signaled support for a budget deal worked out yesterday between Ryan and Senate Budget Committee Chair Rep. Patty Murray, D-Wash. The budget deal was one of a few major measures left on Congress' to-do list near the end of a bruising year that has produced a partial government shutdown, a flirtation with a first-ever federal default and gridlock on President Obama's agenda. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Hershey, Pa. — Republicans met privately on Thursday to discuss how they’ll respond if the Supreme Court strips health insurance subsidies from millions of Americans in a case about the validity of Obamacare premium tax credits in three-dozen states.

The discussion of the case King v. Burwell — set to be decided by the end of June — loomed large in a strategy meeting on health care held at a resort hotel here in the afternoon. Republicans didn’t come away with a plan.

“The discussion centered on the best strategy in context of the upcoming King v. Burwell Supreme Court case … and moving quickly to show the country Republicans have a patient-centered response to King v. Burwell,” an aide in the room, who wasn’t authorized to speak on the record, said after the meeting.

The discussion was led by House Ways & Means Chair Paul Ryan (R-WI) and House Energy & Commerce Chair Fred Upton (R-MI), the aide said.

“We’re obviously doing contingency planning for King v. Burwell,” Ryan told reporters after the meeting. “It would be wrong not to. … That’s something that is an ongoing conversation and we’re doing all of our diligence on that.”

Latest DC
48
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for taters taters says:

    Because freedom? Or better, Benghazi!

  2. Avatar for fgs fgs says:

    Their patient centered response is real simple. Let the patient pay for their own health care

  3. Or they could just tighten up the language in the existing law. But plotting sounds like so much more fun!

  4. Avatar for pshah pshah says:

    I"m certain actually HAVING a health care plan-well, that won’t be one of their responses.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

42 more replies

Participants

Avatar for paulw Avatar for fgs Avatar for rfscalf Avatar for pearlywhite Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for Diogenes67 Avatar for RhondaPainter Avatar for wombat Avatar for sniffit Avatar for jimellis Avatar for drriddle Avatar for sherlock1 Avatar for taters Avatar for fitley Avatar for deputydawg Avatar for rmthunter Avatar for iamwil Avatar for JOETHEPROFESSOR Avatar for bigdaddydrj Avatar for dnl Avatar for cincypix Avatar for pshah Avatar for sherrybb Avatar for pjcamp

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: