Five Steep Cliffs Facing The New Dysfunctional Congress In 2015

In this photo taken Feb. 10, 2015, House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, joined by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky. are seen on Capitol Hill in Washington. Boehner says Senate Democrats should "get off the... In this photo taken Feb. 10, 2015, House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, joined by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky. are seen on Capitol Hill in Washington. Boehner says Senate Democrats should "get off their ass" and pass a bill to fund the Homeland Security Department and restrict President Barack Obama's executive moves on immigration. His comments Wednesday underscored a worsening stalemate on Capitol Hill with funding for the Homeland Security Department set to expire Feb. 27. A day earlier, McConnell declared the Senate "stuck" on the issue and said the next move was in the House's court. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

WASHINGTON — The new Republican-led Congress marched right up to the edge of its first cliff, peered over the precipice and nearly jumped.

It came within moments of shutting down the Department of Homeland Security over an unrelated dispute about immigration, but managed to avert the crisis. And yet, that was one of the easier tasks facing Republican leaders.

If the first 10 weeks of 2015 are any indication, they have a rough ride ahead. Anxious conservatives see these essential items as their only vehicle to force reforms they yearn for in the face of implacable Democratic and White House opposition.

Here are five major “cliffs” — deadlines by which legislation must be passed in order to avoid disruptions in major federal programs — on the horizon.

1. A steep Medicare cut for doctors

The perennial “doc fix” problem returns once again as the current patch to the flawed Medicare reimbursement formula expires on March 31. Doctors face a steep 21.2 percent cut in payments unless Congress passes legislation to avoid it.

Just about everybody wants to avoid the cuts and replace the “Sustainable Growth Rate” formula. So what’s the problem? It’s extremely expensive. So Congress has instead passed 17 short-term fixes since 2002, often replenishing physician payments with cuts elsewhere in the budget. Each such fix has meant fewer places to find the roughly $17 billion needed annually to stave off the cuts.

2. Highway funding runs dry

The highway trust fund — an important pool of federal money used to finance road construction and mass transit projects — expires May 31. The current extension is a stopgap measure passed by a divided Congress last July to avoid insolvency. And despite a modicum of bipartisan support for financing it by raising the gas tax, there’s no appetite for it among House Republican leaders. So Congress is stuck again on how to find the revenues to replenish the fund.

3. Depletion of the Children’s Health Care Program

Federal funding for the Children’s Health Care Program (short-hand: CHIP) runs out at the end of September.

The program, which helps states provided needed medical coverage to families with children, is broadly bipartisan but fraught with disputes, as is all other health care legislation. Disputes over how much money the government should spend, what sorts of reforms should be made and the length of a reauthorization could make the project cumbersome for the new Congress.

4. A(nother) government shutdown

Funding for the federal government expires on September 30 at midnight.

Since Republicans took over the House in 2011, the mere act of keeping the government open has been an arduous task. It’s not hard to imagine conservatives picking another battle in the hope of finally scoring a victory, but it’s harder to imagine Democrats caving for the first time.

A complicating factor is the return of the sequestration — the jackhammer of across-the-board spending cuts imposed in the 2011 Budget Control Act. It will be very expensive to avoid, and tough to find a balance between more targeted cuts and (if Democrats have their way) revenues to stave off the sequester. Another partisan divide: Republicans are more concerned about avoiding military cuts while Democrats are more concerned about avoiding domestic cuts to programs like education and health care.

5. A catastrophic debt default

The new deadline to raise the debt ceiling or risk a disastrous default will be in October or November, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

The U.S came within one day of breaching the debt limit in 2013, which economists say would have sent the stock market tumbling and risked a global economic meltdown. Conservatives view it as an existential issue — true believers think allowing more debt (even when it’s just a matter of paying bills) irreparably harms the country.

House Budget Chairman Tom Price (R-GA) has hinted at another showdown by saying the debt limit deadline presents “opportunities and pinch points” to potentially seek dollar-for-dollar spending cuts in return. But Democrats have no intention of supporting that.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. I would add “Water Runs Dry” to this list. Here in the West, groundwater depletion and drought have profound long-term implications. Groundwater damage is also now common in most states, A situation where the government must start apportioning costs, liability and enforcing land retirements without a fair system in place as required under the 5th Amendment takings clause could get mighty messy mighty quickly. The giant irony here would be that the US, of all countries, was the one to get hobbled by its own domestic resource extraction industries (something more appropriate to petrostates like Russia or Canada), which provide little in the way of innovation.

    Indeed, innovation should be the one area where Congress is functional. It is the single largest driver of economic growth by a wide margin, with about a 3 to 1 payoff on any invested dollar. This is not just true in the US case, but any advanced economies. Indeed, any rural provincial official in China will tell you this obvious fact (and that’s a country that lacks the legal framework and property right protections enjoyed in the US). Yet we do not see the US Congress meeting around the clock to figure out what we can do to encourage the ephemeralization of technology, decarbonization of the economy, or new ways to invest in the American people. It’s like “Well folks, you have always provided a great return on education and training investment, but we gotta send this letter to Iran and throw a snowball at invisible Obama.” Instead our Congress seems to be going for the Mad Max scenario, which has not just falling off cliffs and car chases, but explosions, weird hair (thank you, John Fleming-LA), and a dystopian culture that relies on oral histories.

  2. Don’t forget the possible crisis if the SCOTUS upends ACA subsidies! You know there’s not a credible GOP plan out there if they succeed in creating this crisis (which they thought would be a good idea).

  3. The faces of the two most incompetent men in Congress.

  4. Avatar for lew lew says:

    Hmm, let see, people vote for a party that keeps saying, loudly and proudly that government is evil and incompetent.

    Why then are they surprised when it turns out that the same party runs the government in an evil and incompetent manner?

  5. Christ! These guys are the rust of government. They have un-accomplished so much that when they die, their coffins will be placed face down on a six foot mound of dirt.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

26 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for fgs Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for brooklyndweller Avatar for bwakfat Avatar for leftflank Avatar for eggrollian Avatar for clemmers Avatar for epicurus Avatar for oscarhomolka Avatar for dizcuzted Avatar for cwazycajun Avatar for sandyh Avatar for bluinmaine Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for ActuallyThoughtful Avatar for iheardthisbefore Avatar for photoglyph Avatar for grinninglibber Avatar for nylib Avatar for emilianoelmexicano Avatar for meta Avatar for chicago11 Avatar for us_resident

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: