In it, but not of it. TPM DC
... it's about Carol Browner, the incoming White House climate and energy adviser. As Sen. Jim Inhofe (OK), senior Republican on the environment committee and the leading fly in the climate change ointment, told the Washington Times:
I'm quite concerned that [Sutley's] role has been diluted by the addition of former EPA Administrator Carol Browner as White House climate and energy czar. The new Senate-confirmed CEQ chair will be expected to have the full authority to represent the White House on all matters before this committee.
By holding up Jackson and Sutley, Senate Republicans are doing more than just signaling their discontent that they won't get to question and vote on Browner -- although Sen. Bob Corker [R-TN] suggests to the Times that Browner be called in for a "quasi-confirmation" hearing. They're previewing their strategy to knock down the climate regulation bill that Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), environment committee chairman, will release later this year.
Here's how it might look: After Boxer's climate bill emerges, Republicans would immediately protest the involvement of Browner, a White House adviser who was never fully vetted by the Senate. (Never mind that installing senior aides in the White House to avoid confirmation was a hallmark of George Bush.)
By raising questions about Jackson's authority over the regulatory process, GOPers would generate media interest in the storyline -- Is the president's adviser interfering to push for stronger action? -- and create a drag on the legislative movement to regulate emissions. Senators are already making clear that action on climate change is more likely to come next year than this year, even as House energy and commerce chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) vows to pass a bill by Memorial Day.
Which Republican senator is behind the Jackson and Sutley holds, and how soon can Democrats break the delay? We'll keep you posted.