The Left Ramps Up Push For Warren Vs. Clinton

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., right, poses for photograph with supporter Henry Mondragon during appearance at a campaign headquarters in northwest Denver suburb of Wheat Ridge, Colo., on Friday, Sept. 5, 2014... U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., right, poses for photograph with supporter Henry Mondragon during appearance at a campaign headquarters in northwest Denver suburb of Wheat Ridge, Colo., on Friday, Sept. 5, 2014. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

It has been percolating for some time, but the appetite among some on the left for a strong Democratic primary challenger to Hillary Clinton, should she decide to run in 2016, has burst into the open in recent days.

Two progressive grassroots groups, MoveOn.org and Howard Dean’s Democracy for America, announced Tuesday that they would launch efforts to draft Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) into the race, if their members approved.

“There is too much at stake to have anything other than our best candidates in the debate,” Ilya Sheyman, executive director of MoveOn.org Political Action, said in a statement. “We are prepared to show Senator Warren that she has the support she needs to enter—and win—the presidential race.”

If a majority of its members okay it, MoveOn.org plans to spend at least $1 million to convince Warren to seek the White House. That would include staffing up in states like Iowa and New Hampshire, assembling volunteers and small-dollar donors à la the Ready for Hillary PAC, and media buys. Democracy for America didn’t detail its plans, but noted that a previous poll of its members had Warren with a nearly 20-point advantage over Clinton.

It was the latest sign among what you might call the institutional left of a desire for somebody to seriously challenge Clinton, who is currently an unprecedented favorite to be the Democratic nominee if she makes a bid.

The Nation focused most of its Dec. 15 issue on the need for a challenge to Clinton from the left. “Even the most ardent Hillary supporters should acknowledge that the Democratic Party, and the country, will be better served if she has real competition in the primaries,” the magazine’s editors wrote. “This is not an anti-Hillary message; it’s a pro-democracy one.”

The MoveOn/DFA combination is also, at least in theory, a significant amplification of the effort to pull Warren specifically into the race. They have more than 9 million members between them, a base that could plausibly compete with the three-million-plus supporters that Ready for Hillary has amassed. However, the $1 million that MoveOn.org pledged is paltry compared to the $12 million that Ready for Hillary has raised since its founding last year. It is significantly more, though, than the $66,000 that Ready for Warren, the main draft group prior to this week, has raised while attracting tens of thousands of supporters.

Erica Sagrans, who launched the Ready for Warren PAC, told TPM that MoveOn gave her a heads up before the Tuesday announcement and said it would look for ways for the groups to work together. “The only thing inevitable about the 2016 presidential race is that the movement to draft Senator Warren will grow stronger and louder,” she said in an email.

But is it really going to make a difference? Warren’s office repeated Tuesday that she is not running for president. Lacey Rose, a Warren spokeswoman, told TPM that neither MoveOn or DFA had consulted the senator before making their announcements.

“As Senator Warren has said many times, she is not running for President,” Rose said in an email.

But there is a recognition even among those who are supporting a Hillary candidacy that the desire for a robust primary challenge is real. They have also been saying all the right things about taking any potential insurgents seriously.

“There is a sentiment that the left and HRC would be better served if she had something to be fearful of,” one source aligned with the proto-Hillary 2016 world told TPM.

If Warren stays out as she says she will then, the question is whether this energy will dissipate or shift to another candidate. Clinton might not actually have much of a progressive problem once the real voting starts, as others have written, but a well-financed and well-run opposition campaign could still be a hassle for her if it taps into any lingering disaffection with her candidacy.

Former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb (D) has already announced an exploratory committee, and two of the other most likely candidates — Sen. Bernie Sanders and outgoing Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley — have recently made some high-profile hires for their expected campaigns.

Sanders recruited Tad Devine, who worked on Al Gore and John Kerry’s presidential campaigns, and his team has been game-planning its fundraising needs, according to MSNBC. O’Malley has brought on Bill Hyers, who managed New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s 2013 campaign, as Politico reported last week.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Poor Hillary. I wonder if she’ll attack and lie about hard working Democrats again like she did the last time this grassroots organization attempted to be a part of the democratic process?

    Moveon.org endorsed [Sen. Barack Obama] – which is like a gusher of money that never seems to slow down.We have been less successful in caucuses because it brings out the activist base of the Democratic Party. MoveOn didn’t even want us to go into Afghanistan. I mean, that’s what we’re dealing with. And you know they turn out in great numbers. And they are very driven by their view of our positions, and it’s primarily national security and foreign policy that drives them. I don’t agree with them. They know I don’t agree with them. So they flood into these caucuses and dominate them and really intimidate people who actually show up to support me.”

    This was a true insult. I was at the 2008 Iowa caucuses. There was no intimidation and flood of MoveOn supporters. The sad truth is she just wasn’t the same caliber speaker as Obama, just as she isn’t in the same league with Elizabeth Warren.

  2. Hmm, love the idea. Liz and Bernie is a ticket I WOULD support. Two people who DO speak truth to power.

  3. Whoa! Liz and Bernie? Never happen! I’d love to see it, but as long as we allow the deluded to vote, it never will. Hopefully, someday, we will realize that there should be additional requirements to vote, beyond coming out of the chute in the US.

    I believe that passing a “civics-type” test should be required of every would-be voter six months before the primary in each state. Yeah, I know, sounds “old South” and Jim Crow, but if you look at US education results and the number of viewers Fox has, you have to realize that the uninformed and the misinformed should be kept away from the ballot box!

  4. I’m not sure how I feel about this. Warren is the stronger candidate for me, but I wonder if she, as a MA Liberal, could win the hard core Appalachean working whites to win the GE. I know Hillary can win them because of Bill, but not sure if Warren can beat Jeb with those deluded puppets voting “stupid” at the ballot box. Bush III is a nightmare I do not wish upon the US, all armed with another right wing SCOTUS nominee.

  5. I have been forced to the conclusion that it is impossible for anyone from Massachusetts not named Adams or Kennedy to win a presidential election and both of those families have been out of the president-minting business for a long time.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

141 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for richardinjax Avatar for jw1 Avatar for ncsteve Avatar for UnfadingGreen Avatar for berkshire_boy Avatar for avattoir Avatar for chammy Avatar for sywht Avatar for bradbennett Avatar for lio Avatar for Dawn_Rainbow Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for blueberrytomatosoup Avatar for daveyjones64 Avatar for sonsofares Avatar for theghostofeustacetilley Avatar for darcy Avatar for martinheldt Avatar for barblzz Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for jinnj Avatar for knitter Avatar for oldgrouch

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: