STUDY: House GOP O’Care Repeal Bill Cuts $43B From Children’s Medicaid

UNITED STATES - MARCH 9: Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wis., conducts a presentation in the House studio of the American Health Care Act, the GOP's plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, March 9, 201... UNITED STATES - MARCH 9: Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wis., conducts a presentation in the House studio of the American Health Care Act, the GOP's plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, March 9, 2017. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call) (CQ Roll Call via AP Images) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The major overhaul of Medicaid House Republicans passed with their bill to repeal Obamacare earlier this month would cut $43 billion in Medicaid funding for non-disabled children over 10 years, a study by the consultant firm Avalere found. The study also broke down the cuts by states, finding that Texas, Florida and New York would be the biggest losers in Medicaid funding for children’s health care coverage.

The House GOP bill, the American Health Care Act, transforms the traditional Medicaid program from an unlimited match rate to what is known as a per capita cap, meaning the feds would set a limit on the funding offered to states on a per enrollee basis. Because the metric Republicans use to raise the caps over time is slower than the inflation rate of Medicaid, the cuts to the program would grow bigger over time.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the original version of the legislation would cut $880 billion from the program over the next decade.

The GOP Senate is in the process of writing its own bill to dismantle the Affordable Care Act that they said will include an overhaul of Medicaid. So far, they have signaled that they will embrace the House’s per capita cap’s approach, but are tinkering with the nuts and bolts of how the caps would work.

 

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. But…but…but…Trump said his plan would be cheaper and better.
    OH, he meant cheaper for the government and thus, better for the 2 percenters tax cuts.

  2. After all the wealthiest 1% need that money far more than the children.

  3. “If those kids don’t like it, they shouldn’t have stayed home on election day.”

  4. The AHCA is also going to cut $$$ from children WITH disabilities. I know that it’s been a heavy news flow, but I’d like to see someone outside disability orgs mention that it CUTS FUNDING TO PAY FOR SPEECH, PHYSICAL, AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIES BY SCHOOLS.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

19 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for david_e_brown Avatar for paulw Avatar for srfromgr Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for bluestatedon Avatar for afisher Avatar for mantan Avatar for keninmn Avatar for stiggy Avatar for ronbyers Avatar for maire Avatar for dnl Avatar for 62fender Avatar for chlarry Avatar for tiowally Avatar for dannydorko Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for drtv Avatar for eisenst Avatar for old_prog

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: