CBO: Obamacare Costing The Feds A Third Less Than Expected

FILE - This March 1, 2014 file photo shows part of the website for HealthCare.gov, seen in Washington. President Barack Obama’s health care law has become a tale of two Americas. States that fully embraced the law... FILE - This March 1, 2014 file photo shows part of the website for HealthCare.gov, seen in Washington. President Barack Obama’s health care law has become a tale of two Americas. States that fully embraced the law’s coverage expansion are experiencing a significant drop in the share of their residents who remain uninsured, according to an extensive new poll released Tuesday. States whose leaders still object to “Obamacare” are seeing much less change. The Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, cumulatively based on tens of thousands of interviews, found a drop of 4 percentage points in the share of uninsured residents for states that adopted the law’s Medicaid expansion and either built or helped run their own online insurance markets. (AP Photo/Jon Elswick, File) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

The Congressional Budget Office said Friday that its projections for the federal government’s spending on the Affordable Care Act’s coverage provisions in 2019 are now a third lower than what they were when the law was passed in 2010.

CBO Director Keith Hall said in written responses to questions posed by the House Budget Committee that the CBO expects the federal government to spend $148 billion in 2019 on the law’s coverage provisions, down from the $214 billion estimated when the law was passed.

Hall cited a number of reasons for why the law is costing the federal government less than originally expected. One is that less people are using the individual market than anticipated, lowering the feds’ spending on things like the subsidies for insurance premiums. Additionally, Medicare and Medicaid’s costs are coming in under expectations, as are the costs of private insurance — a slowdown in health care costs Hall speculated could have been driven by the recession.

“Although it is unclear how much of that slowdown is attributable to the recession and its aftermath and how much is attributable to other factors, the slower growth has been sufficiently broad and persistent to persuade the
agencies to significantly lower their projections of federal costs for health care,” Hall said.

The Supreme Court’s decision in 2012 to make Medicaid expansion optional for states also “significantly reduced projected costs,” Hall said.

The lowered estimates comes as Republicans are gearing up their push to repeal the Affordable Care Act. The proposals being floated would eliminate the law’s taxes while phasing out its benefits — like its subsidies and its Medicaid expansion — over the course of a few years. GOP lawmakers have signaled that they are willing to advance the repeal legislation before it has been fully scored by the CBO.

Latest DC
Comments
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: