Brookings: More Than 21M People Will Lose Coverage Under Graham-Cassidy

United States Senator Lindsey Graham (Republican of South Carolina) speaks to reporters outside the US Senate Chamber following the Republican weekly luncheon caucus in the US Capitol in Washington, DC on Tuesday, Se... United States Senator Lindsey Graham (Republican of South Carolina) speaks to reporters outside the US Senate Chamber following the Republican weekly luncheon caucus in the US Capitol in Washington, DC on Tuesday, September 19, 2017. The GOP leadership is advocating for the passage of the Graham-Cassidy Act that would replace parts of the Affordable Care Act (also known as ObamaCare) with block grants for the individual states. From left to right: US Senator John Barrasso (Republican of Wyoming), Senator Graham, US Senator Bill Cassidy (Republican of Louisiana) and US Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Republican of Kentucky). Credit: Ron Sachs / CNP - NO WIRE SERVICE - Photo by: Ron Sachs/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A new report from the Brookings Institute estimates that 21 million people will lose their health insurance by 2026 under Senate Republicans’ latest bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act. The report cautions that it’s a very conservative estimate that doesn’t take into account the bill’s per-capita Medicaid caps and the individual market turmoil the plan would likely create. The true number of uninsured people, the authors note, is likely much higher.

Because the Graham-Cassidy bill would repeal Obamacare’s individual and employer mandates, but retain the rule requiring insurers to cover everyone regardless of their health status, Brookings expects that only sick people who need insurance will purchase it, driving the price sky high for them and everyone else left in the shrinking risk pool. Those high prices will price many people out of the market entirely.

 

After 2020, the bill would also sharply cut back federal funding for states that expanded Medicaid, gutting some state budgets by tens of billions of dollars.

“Some states might elect to begin the process of winding down their Medicaid expansion prior to 2020, which could also add to coverage losses during this period,” the report noted.

Brookings also notes that there is nothing in the bill to prevent states from spending the federal block grants that used to be their Medicaid and ACA marketplace budgets for completely unrelated purposes, such as cutting taxes.

After 2026, the losses would become far more severe, with more than 30 million people losing insurance “because of the additional changes to the Medicaid program under this legislation.”

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. Well, Donnie has revivified much of the Nixon administration, so why not firebomb Brookings?

  2. The headline should reflect the upper bound, long-term estimate.

  3. A lot of people are covered by family plans. Do their estimates take that into consideration?

    Is it 30,000,000 accounts, and 30,000,000 x 3 people?

  4. Avatar for brissy brissy says:

    No surprises here, I guess. One thing in this discussion that I think in part explains the divide between repubs and Dems on this issue is the use of their verb ‘to lose’. While Dems see millions ‘losing’ coverage, the repubs see millions having the choice whether or not to purchase coverage - and exercising that choice accordingly. So depending on your political persuasion, millions ‘losing’ coverage can look like success or failure.

    There’s a strange mirror between Repub and dem positions on healthcare. With broad strokes, repubs are obsessed with preserving life at all costs for the first few months from conception, while Dems are obsessed with extending life at all costs

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

38 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for paulw Avatar for fess Avatar for buckguy Avatar for marby Avatar for kwoodgr Avatar for matthew1961 Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for randyabraham Avatar for ralph_vonholst Avatar for lastroth Avatar for ottnott Avatar for fiftygigs Avatar for tena Avatar for khyber900 Avatar for libthinker Avatar for kumquat16 Avatar for coprophagoussmile Avatar for pghmike4 Avatar for brissy

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: