Senate GOPer: Don’t Repeal Obamacare’s Taxes Without A Plan

Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., questions State Department Under Secretary for Political Affairs Thomas Shannon, Jr., as he testifies at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, April 5, 2016, on recent Iranian actions and implementation of the nuclear deal. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
In this photo taken April 5, 2016, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn. speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump met with Corker i... In this photo taken April 5, 2016, Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn. speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump met with Corker in New York on Monday, May 23, 2016, intensifying speculation that the U.S. senator from Tennessee may be on Trump’s vice presidential shortlist. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), one of the Republicans who has been skeptical of the plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act without a replacement, elaborated on his concerns Monday evening, pointing specifically to how lawmakers will fund its replacement if the Obamacare taxes are repealed right away.

“It just seems to me that probably you’re better off working this all out together,” Corker said. “That may not end up being the case and that of course would take some Democratic cooperation, but I think people are beginning to realize that throwing $116 billion dollars in a mud puddle is a pretty big deal.”

Corker is of one of about a half-dozen Republicans who have suggested that that the lawmakers pump the breaks on its repeal plan to work out some of the details of their replacement. Asked Monday if there are been discussions among the caucus to assuage some of those concerns, Corker said “There aren’t really discussions right now.”

He added that “each of us are talking to folks whom may be with the incoming administration and others about some of the issues, but there isn’t sort of a group discussion.”

“It’s hard to allay a fear like, if you do away with all the revenues and continue subsidies you’re throwing $116 billion in a mud puddle. I don’t know how you alleviate that kind of concern. It’s just real,” Corker said. “It seems to me that if you’re going to keep providing subsidies you ought to keep generating some revenues to pay for it. It’s difficult to allay the concern that if you end it 3 yrs without a replacement, what Republican is going to vote for a tax increase to fund it? I don’t know any.”

Leadership so far has signaled it intends to move forward with its current plan, to use reconciliation, a procedural maneuver that would avoid a Democratic filibuster, with a bill similar to 2015 legislation that was vetoed by President Obama. That legislation dismantled major ACA taxes right away but delayed repeal of the subsidies for two years.

Latest DC

Notable Replies

  1. “Pay for subsides, what do you think I am a Liberal commie Democrat? Paying for things is for suckas.”

  2. that of course would take some Democratic cooperation

    Take Obama’s advice, Dems: Don’t lift a goddamn finger to bail the motherfuckers out. Let 'em own it lock, stock and barrel. If they’re happy enough to build a coffin, let 'em to use the nails.

  3. Senator, there’s someone I think you should meet. His name is Paul Ryan…

  4. So did Bob Corker vote for all the other repeals?

  5. Plan: take one aspirin, then get lost.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

11 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for ajaykalra Avatar for marby Avatar for clunkertruck Avatar for lastroth Avatar for zrx1100 Avatar for dickweed Avatar for dnl Avatar for darrtown Avatar for jonnygee Avatar for jacksonhts Avatar for nwlefty Avatar for tiowally Avatar for overthefall96 Avatar for coprophagoussmile Avatar for drtv

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: