The Weird Rhythm Of The Christine Blasey Ford Hearing

Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her at a party 36 years ago, testifies during his US Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, September 27, 2018. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / POOL / AFP)        (Photo credit should read SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)
Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her at a party 36 years ago, testifies during his US Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol H... Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her at a party 36 years ago, testifies during his US Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, September 27, 2018. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / POOL / AFP) (Photo credit should read SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS

The format Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) has put forward for Christine Blasey Ford to testify about her allegations that Brett Kavanaugh groped her has created a jarring contrast between the Democrats’ and Republicans’ approach to the hearing — even more jarring than the typical hearing in which one side is fawning over the witness and the other is grilling him or her.

Rachel Mitchell, who’s doing the questioning for the Republicans, is speaking smoothly, but meticulously as she asks Blasey Ford about the minute details of her account.

She can never get very far down those lines of questioning however. The format is such that she only gets five minutes at a time, to supplant the five minutes that the Republican senator in line for questioning would get, before it’s time for a Democrat to question the witness.

Grassley has cut Mitchell off to tell her it’s the Democrats’ turn for questioning, which isn’t exactly helping the optics goal of bringing in Mitchell in the first place — to avoid awkward moments from the male Republicans.

The Democratic senators usually begin with a longwinded monologue that is more of the norm of the grandstanding that happens at these high profile hearings. When they do get to their questions, they’re often aimed on letting Blasey Ford stress how deeply the alleged assault has been ingrained in her memory.

Throughout both sides’ questioning, she has kept a calm composure, though her voice at times sounds raw. She has been careful in answering the questions, and has even corrected herself midway through testifying.

The tension between these two dynamics has been at times been broken by exchanges with Blasey Ford about the mechanics of the hearing. She said at the beginning of her testimony, when asked if she would need a break after her opening remarks, that she might need some coffee.

A few rounds of questioning in, Grassley asked her if she was still set for a break after another few rounds. Christine Blasey Ford asked if that worked for the members, prompting Grassley to say they’re just trying to accommodate her.

“I’m used to being collegial,” Blasey Ford said.

56
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for dave48 dave48 says:

    Chuck Grassley is really just coming off as a grumpy old man who has a grudge against the world. Good lord he looks bad at this.

  2. I can’t legally say in public what I want to happen to Chuck Grassley, Mitch McConnell, Brett Kavanaugh, and the rest of their foul ilk.

  3. This is quickly developing into a worst case scenario for Republicans.

    Kavanaugh has to testify after this, and what possible testimony can he give to mitigate hers? Her statement is that he was profoundly drunk at the time, so if he claims he doesn’t recall, or denies it happened the natural question is, “Were you too drunk to remember…” His only defense would be to say he was never that drunk but there are dozens of people willing to say that he did drink with regularity.

    The only thing that makes sense is that the GOP was banking on her not being willing to testify, or breaking down under questioning, and that was a hell of a gamble to take under the circumstances. One that has clearly backfired.

  4. Avatar for jl55 jl55 says:

    The choppiness of the R line of questioning isn’t doing them any favors. Dr. Ford seems to be handling the awkwardness well.

  5. Avatar for dave48 dave48 says:

    A comment on Reddit about Mitchell’s questioning:

    “You dislike brussel sprouts, correct?”

    “That is correct.”

    “But you like food, cooking, and the like?”

    “Sure”

    “You’ve eaten brussel sprouts at Thanksgiving dinner haven’t you?”

    “Yes, but that’s because I didn’t want to be rude”

    “I see”

    Is this next? That’s basically where we’re at, right? In a hearing about sexual assault? Cool.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

50 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system Avatar for dr_coyote Avatar for cmbudinger Avatar for dave48 Avatar for losamigos Avatar for tamdai Avatar for gr Avatar for denisj Avatar for esva Avatar for serendipitoussomnambulist Avatar for dddinah Avatar for jl55 Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for pablo_carson Avatar for ernestscribbler Avatar for jess Avatar for firewing2 Avatar for demosthenes59 Avatar for maracel Avatar for clare Avatar for texastoast Avatar for skeptical Avatar for carolson Avatar for countersniper

Continue Discussion