Texas Lawmakers Prepare To Defy Supreme Court On Gay Marriage

Texas State Rep. Cecil Bell, Jr, center, is helped by Jonathan Saenz, left, President of Texas Values, and his fellow legislators including Rep. Molly White, left in red, and Sen. Donna Campbell, right in red, as the... Texas State Rep. Cecil Bell, Jr, center, is helped by Jonathan Saenz, left, President of Texas Values, and his fellow legislators including Rep. Molly White, left in red, and Sen. Donna Campbell, right in red, as they celebrate the state's ban on same-sex marriage during Faith and Family Day at the Capitol in Austin, Texas, on Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2015. They celebrated with a wedding cake and speeches to a crowd that included members of Texas Values, Concerned Women for America, and Texas Right to Life, along with state legislators from both chambers. (AP Photo/Austin American-Statesman, Ralph Barrera) AUSTIN CHRONICLE OUT, COMMUNITY IMPACT OUT, INTERNET AND TV MUST CREDIT PHOTOGRAPHER AND STATESMAN.COM, MAGS OUT MORE LESS
Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

Texas lawmakers are gearing up to pass one of the country’s most aggressively anti-same-sex-marriage bills this week. The bill, HB 4105, would prohibit state and local governments from recognizing, granting or enforcing same-sex marriage licenses. More than half of the members of Texas’ House of Representatives have signed on as co-sponsors to the bill, making its passage in that chamber likely before the Thursday deadline the House has for House bills to be heard on the House floor.

The measure’s sponsors say it is a pre-emptive move ahead of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling expected in June that could legalize same-sex marriage nationwide.

“We as Texans have a sovereign right to define and regulate marriage,” Republican state Rep. Cecil Bell, the author of the bill, told TPM on Tuesday. “I don’t believe that this bill puts anyone in a lesser position than what they were in before. What this does is codify Texas law.”

As gay marriage headed to the U.S.’s highest court, state legislators across the country introduced measures to undercut efforts to expand marriage rights to same-sex couples. Texas lawmakers put forward some 20 anti-gay bills this term.

Bell’s bill and another measure that guarantees that clergy would not have to participate in marriages that violate their faith are the only Texas bills to make it out of committee. The clergy bill has been narrowed in scope during the amendment process to the point that Democrats and LGBT rights activists are comfortable with it.

Supporters say they have a similar level of support for HB 4105 in the state Senate as they do in the state House. Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has not yet taken a public stance on the measure. If passed, both measures will likely not go into effect until September, and HB 4105’s constitutionality could be challenged, depending on how the Supreme Court rules on same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges, where a decision is expected in late June.

“It’s going to cause confusion and unnecessary litigation,” says Eric Lesh, Fair Courts Project Manager for Lambda Legal, which opposes HB 4105.

There are also concerns about a backlash to the measure, with Texas business leaders warning Texas legislators that anti-gay measures are bad for the state’s economy. Indiana faced boycotts when Republican Gov. Mike Pence signed a so-called religious freedom law in March that could have given businesses the right to discriminate against gay couples; lawmakers there rushed to amend the bill to clarify that it could not be used to discriminate against same-sex couples.

“Astonishingly, some Texas lawmakers seem to have completely missed—or are purposely ignoring—the lessons learned from the harmful anti-LGBT debacle in Indiana,” said Stephen Peters, a Human Rights Campaign spokesman, in a statement. “These bills have nothing to do with Texas values and have everything to do with enshrining discrimination into state law.”

Correction: This story previously said the Texas legislative session concluded Thursday. The regular legislative session concludes in June. Thursday is the deadline for House bills to be heard on the House floor.

Latest DC
58
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Lovely.

    Once the Supreme Court rules, they can let us know how all of that is working out for them!

    National Guardsmen at County Clerk’s offices forcing the granting of marriage licenses, and dragging away the hysterical pudgy bible-spouting clerks, who will be 24 hour celebrities as they are carted off to jail! Pass the popcorn!

  2. Avatar for wwss wwss says:

    “We as Texans have a sovereign right to …” well then form your own Sovereign Sate why don’t you … I assure you that the vast majority of the nation would NOT miss you at all. In fact, think of all the money we’d save from not having to bail Texas out from under the great administrations of Bush, Perry and the current idiots governing Texas.

  3. The measure’s sponsors say it is a pre-emptive move ahead of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling expected in June that could legalize same-sex marriage nationwide.

    You can preempt all you want, but if the Supreme Court finds a Constitutional right to marriage equality you and your bigoted legislation are screwed.

  4. Do they really not get how the constitution works? I would love it if Texas would become it’s own country…can’t happen too soon.
    Would be good to show others how well that will work out for them to enact
    a theocracy.

  5. Would be amazing for the Black president to send the guard to protect marriage rights, and if the TX guard balks, we could enact martial law…nice.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

52 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for rxbusa Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for erikthered Avatar for doninsd Avatar for Diogenes67 Avatar for 1daven Avatar for tsalagi51 Avatar for boscobrown Avatar for populuxecowboy Avatar for mantan Avatar for sniffit Avatar for helen8 Avatar for grandpoobah Avatar for johnscotus Avatar for joelopines Avatar for suicide_arsonist Avatar for constitutionfan Avatar for zuch Avatar for khaaannn Avatar for azjude Avatar for thunderclapnewman Avatar for beattycat Avatar for sherron

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Deputy Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: