Judiciary Council Dismisses Kavanaugh Ethics Complaints

Brett Kavanaugh waits before being sworn-in as Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court in the East room of the White House on October 8, 2018, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP) (Photo credit sh... Brett Kavanaugh waits before being sworn-in as Associate Justice of the US Supreme Court in the East room of the White House on October 8, 2018, in Washington, DC. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP) (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images) MORE LESS

WASHINGTON (AP) — A panel of judges has dismissed ethics complaints against new Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The judges say the complaints must be dismissed because they were filed under a federal law that does not apply to Supreme Court justices. That’s the outcome many ethics experts predicted once Kavanaugh took his Supreme Court seat.

The complaints deal with statements Kavanaugh made during his confirmation hearings. They were filed originally with Kavanaugh’s old court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Chief Justice John Roberts took no action on them while Kavanaugh’s nomination was pending, then transferred them to federal judges in Colorado and neighboring states. Roberts received the first three of 15 eventual complaints on Sept. 20, a week before Kavanaugh’s testimony angrily denying sexual assault allegations.

42
Show Comments

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for imkmu3 imkmu3 says:

    Now he can really lie, grope, and sexually assault with impunity.

  2. Being on the top rung of any government ladder means immunity for anything I guess.

  3. Avatar for paulw paulw says:

    So much for holding your seat under “good behavior”. Those complaints may well be the basis for some hearings.

  4. Avatar for nycabj nycabj says:

    If the ABA model code, used in most states, applied,he’d have a lot to answer for. There is something wrong with allowing the federal judiciary not to have a well functioning disciplinary system. It’s hard when they’re judges for life, which generally I’m fine with, but there should be some clear code and a disciplinary body able to censure or otherwise hold an errant judge up for public awareness. Given some of the egos on that bench, it might be useful.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

36 more replies

Participants

Avatar for system1 Avatar for valgalky23 Avatar for paulw Avatar for politicsinpink Avatar for fgs Avatar for jcs Avatar for bryan Avatar for littlegirlblue Avatar for old_curmudgeon Avatar for george_spiggott Avatar for Lacuna-Synecdoche Avatar for karlsgems Avatar for grandpajoe Avatar for katwillow Avatar for tribalogical Avatar for civik Avatar for jonney_5 Avatar for georgeh Avatar for burningquestions Avatar for tpr Avatar for somuchforsubtlety Avatar for aiddon Avatar for seamus42 Avatar for seveneagles

Continue Discussion