Lawyer For San Bernardino Gunman’s Family Floats Sandy Hook Trutherism

Start your day with TPM.
Sign up for the Morning Memo newsletter

A lawyer for the family of suspected San Bernardino gunman Syed Rizwan Farook floated skepticism about the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in his efforts to cast doubt on early police findings about the massacre at a county holiday party that left 14 dead this week.

Appearing alongside attorney Mohammad Abuershaid, David Chesley said there were “a lot of questions” in the wake of the Newtown, Connecticut shooting, where 20 children and 6 adults were killed. Abuershaid and Chesley have been identified as attorneys representing the Farook family.

“There was a lot of questions drawn with regards to Sandy Hook and whether or not that was a real incident or not. We just don’t know,” Chesley said, in video published Friday by British tabloid The Daily Mail.

The Mail reported that Chesley, asked directly if he questioned the attack at Sandy Hook, said: “There has been a lot [sic] speculation about it is all I would say.”

Regarding the weapons cache police said was recovered after the shooting, which included more than 1,400 rounds of ammunition and 12 pipe bombs, Chesley said: “Obviously, these things were found there, how they got there we don’t know.”

In the video, the attorney also suggested there is “a lot of motivation at this time to emphasize or create incidents that will cause gun control or prejudice or hatred toward the Muslim community.”

The lawyer further cast doubt on the plausibility of 27-year-old Tashfeen Malik’s involvement in the mass shooting. Malik was Farook’s wife.

“It doesn’t seem plausible to us that this petite woman [Malik] would be involved in this sort of hyper-caricatured, Bonnie and Clyde crazy scenario,” he told press.

Abuershaid attempted to redirect the narrative, saying Farook “was living the American dream,” and emphasized the investigation is ongoing.

Watch the video via the Daily Mail:

Latest Livewire

Notable Replies

  1. Avatar for chammy chammy says:

    What - where the hell did they get this guy. He sure isn’t going to help matters and why does the family need a lawyer. What am I missing here?

  2. Avatar for estamm estamm says:

    There won’t be any S.B. truthers, because the shooters were Muslim.

  3. Avatar for tao tao says:

    Daily Mail. Rupert Murdoch. Yup. The usual suspects.

  4. “There was a lot of questions drawn with regards to Sandy Hook and whether or not that was a real incident or not. We just don’t know,” Chesley said,

    We don’t know if Sandy Hook was a real incident? Why don’t we? Are we fucking nuts?

  5. Go fuck yourself.

    Signed,

    Residents of Sandy Hook.

    PS: Seriously–go fuck yourself.

Continue the discussion at forums.talkingpointsmemo.com

136 more replies

Participants

Avatar for lestatdelc Avatar for overreach_this Avatar for winfran Avatar for mattinpa Avatar for steviedee111 Avatar for semiotix Avatar for cliffhendroval Avatar for sniffit Avatar for terje Avatar for phillydave Avatar for cpinva Avatar for michandaro Avatar for 538liberal Avatar for tao Avatar for bjones1024 Avatar for bd2999 Avatar for mrf Avatar for dnl Avatar for darrtown Avatar for zd123 Avatar for beattycat Avatar for professorpoopypants Avatar for stillblue Avatar for neddyseagoon

Continue Discussion
Masthead Masthead
Founder & Editor-in-Chief:
Executive Editor:
Managing Editor:
Associate Editor:
Editor at Large:
General Counsel:
Publisher:
Head of Product:
Director of Technology:
Associate Publisher:
Front End Developer:
Senior Designer: