TPM Reader AM asks …
Does someone at the AP have it out for Harry Reid? Seems like they are pushing minor rule misinterpretations up to full scandal type stories. Is there a central figure behind this?
In a word, yes.
AP reporter John Solomon. We reported on this fairly extensively when Solomon first got cranking on this in June.
I know a number of people who know or have worked for Solomon. And I’ve never gotten the impression that Solomon has any political or ideological ax to grind. His rep is as an easy mark for oppo researchers peddling their wares — and from both sides.
Here’s what one former colleague of Solomon’s said last week: “I worked [X] years in the same office as Solomon, sometimes with him. The consensus: he’s lazy, and takes hit jobs handed him on a platter by opps research teams (and anyone will do.) And doesn’t do much to clean it up. I also know one of his fave and frequent sources is Barbara Comstock, former DOJ spxwoman and GOP attack dog.”
I’ve heard the same from numerous oppo researchers and journalists. (Here are some thoughts on legitimate and illegitimate ways journalists use material from oppo researchers.)
If you’re interested in finding out more about this, you might also look at this 2004 article in The Atlantic Monthly about how oppo researchers get their goods into articles. Look at the articles referenced and then go back and see the bylines.
On Reid, I think it’s a combination of two things. One, as I said, he’s an easy mark for oppo researchers peddling stuff that other journos didn’t think met the laugh test. And two, he hasn’t really landed a punch yet and Reid’s fought back. So now it’s a bit personal.
