Hello, itâs the weekend. This is The Weekender â
Â
Itâs taken for granted that in a split Congress, very little non-essential legislation will see the light of day. Itâs an odd sort of waiting period, where lawmakers prep various bills, dance around waving their arms for reporters to cover their issue, their lonely floor speeches, their bold-punctuated press releases.
Â
And their bills mostly lay dormant, stuck in the âintroducedâ stage of the legislation tracker. The lucky ones get single chamber passage, only to usually be ignored by the opposing partyâs leadership in the other.
Â
Senate Democratsâ attempts to address judge shopping â the insidious, now ubiquitous gamesmanship where right-wing litigants plant lawsuits in divisions governed by only one right-wing judge to secure partisan victories â live in this split-chamber limbo.
Â
Many of the members are freaked out by this trend, genuinely alarmed by the groundshaking decisions itâs producing. But the chances of getting anything that meaningfully addresses it through the House, where Republicans have cheered these decisions in equal measure, are vanishingly slim.
Â
So, they lay the foundation. Nineteen of them signed a letter imploring the Judicial Conference to internally change its rules on how cases are distributed, to stop one right-wing judge from enjoying a monopoly in his division.
Â
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) â who recounted his experience in the 90s overseeing committee hearings on the abortion drug mifepristone with a broad, nostalgic smile on his face to me in a back hallway of a Senate office building (his wife says he looks like a âboy scoutâ in those old CSPAN clips) â introduced a bill with Rep. Deborah Ross (D-NC) to make lawsuits seeking national injunctions go through a three-judge panel. He was so excited to talk about the bill, and to lament the recent judge-shopped opinion on mifepristone that spurred him to introduce it, that he started answering before I got my question out.
Â
Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) was similarly enraged enough about that mifepristone decision to introduce her own remedy to judge shopping, which would route suits against federal government actions that would extend relief beyond the named parties to the D.C. Circuit. Revealing the unlikelihood of getting anything done legislatively at least until the 2024 elections, she quickly pivoted to fixes the courts could make internally when I asked her about the bill.
Â
The lawmakers can use their various pulpits to raise awareness of the issue: “The courts should do a better job but Congress should nail them down and make sure that theyâre following tougher rules. The Senate could hold hearings. We can speak out on this, we can go to the floor,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) told me. But not much else.
So in the meantime, this is what they do. Lay the groundwork, try to get their colleagues energized about the issue. Hope that when the moment arises, they can pounce on it, bills and caucus support in hand.
Â
Shifting to lean against the hallway wall, out of the traffic of 12-year-old-looking interns and coffee bearing staff, Wyden told me intently: âYou keep your eyes open for all the opportunities.â
Â
More on other news below. Let’s dig in.Â