Nicole Lafond

Nicole Lafond is a news writer for TPM based in New York City. She is also currently earning a master's degree in journalism from Columbia University and previously worked as an education reporter at The News-Gazette in Champaign, Ill. Follow her on Twitter @Nicole_Lafond.

Articles by Nichole

President Donald Trump on Friday said he is “considering a veto” of Congress’ $1.3 trillion spending bill that finally passed in the Senate around midnight Friday.

In a tweet, Trump cited the lack of a plan in the bill for recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program — which he ended last year — and a partially funded border wall.

The White House on Thursday said Trump would support the bill, despite opposition from conservatives over some of the provisions included in the legislation, like a lack of full funding for Trump’s wall.

Those naysayers may have gotten the President’s ear.

“I am considering a VETO of the Omnibus Spending Bill based on the fact that the 800,000 plus DACA recipients have been totally abandoned by the Democrats (not even named in the Bill) and the BORDER WALL, which is desperately needed for our National Defense, is not fully funded,” he said.

If Trump doesn’t sign the bill, which is widely considered a compromise among lawmakers, the government will shut down at midnight.

While the bill does not include a legislative fix for DACA recipients, it does include some funding for border security — $1.6 billion for physical barriers and technology, an amount relatively smaller than what the $25 billion the White House has previously requested.

The spending package passed the House 256-167 on Thursday and cleared the Senate by a 65-32 vote early Friday morning.

Read More →

President Donald Trump’s outgoing lawyer John Dowd told The Wall Street Journal on Thursday that Trump approved of a statement the lawyer released over the weekend, calling for an end to special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election and the Trump campaign.

“(Trump) thought it was a good statement. And I still do,” Dowd told the Journal on Thursday, just after he resigned from Trump’s personal legal team.

On Saturday, Dowd released a statement, calling on Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein to end Mueller’s Russia probe “in light of recent revelations.” Dowd was referencing news that Attorney General Jeff Sessions fired former FBI deputy Director Andrew McCabe for his handling of the bureau’s investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Sessions terminated McCabe just hours before he was set to retire from the FBI, compromising his pension.

Initially, Dowd told reporters that he made the statement on behalf of Trump, but later walked that back, saying he was speaking for himself. Later on Saturday, Trump mirrored Dowd’s remarks, tweeting that the investigation “should never have been started.” 

While Dowd would not publicly say why he resigned on Thursday, people close to the legal team said Dowd was frustrated by Trump’s decision to add attorney Joseph deGenova to his legal team, according to the Journal. Dowd has denied those claims.

Read More →

Fox News contributor John Bolton, who will become the third national security adviser under President Trump’s administration next month, said he was not expecting Trump to announce his appointment on Thursday.

During a previously scheduled interview on Fox News with Martha MacCallum where he regularly appears as a contributor, Bolton joked that he thinks he still has his cable news gig.

“Well, I think I still am a Fox News contributor,” he said. “I haven’t started there yet, so that demonstrates I think this sort of limbo that I’m in because I didn’t really expect an announcement this afternoon, but it’s obviously a great honor. It’s always an honor to serve our country, and I think, particularly, in these times, internationally, it’s a particular honor. So I’m still sort of getting used to it and I’m sure it will take a little more getting used to.”

Bolton said his job offer “came to a conclusion” on Thursday afternoon when he was spotted at the White House. Bolton will replace H.R. McMaster, who has been national security adviser since Michael Flynn was fired for lying about his contacts with Russian officials.

Bolton perviously served as the ambassador to the United Nations under the George W. Bush administration and has a sordid history of neoconservative views.

Read More →

CNN President Jeff Zucker criticized the journalistic integrity of rival Fox News at a media conference Thursday.

Zucker called Fox “state-run TV” and a “pure propaganda machine,” according to The Hollywood Reporter and journalists covering the event.

There are a handful of good journalists there, but I think they are lost in what is a complete propaganda machine,” he reportedly told the audience at the Future of News conference, hosted by the Financial Times. “The idea that it’s a news channel, I think, is really not the case at all.”

Zucker also reportedly said Fox News “has nothing on” Russia’s state run program TASS Russian News Agency. He added that every cable news channel is “doing well, including Fox News.”

Spokespeople for Fox News and CNN did not immediately respond to TPM’s request for comment. Fox News reportedly declined an offer to attend the event, according to The Hollywood Reporter. 

Zucker has received criticism for his network’s coverage of Donald Trump during the 2016 campaign, when CNN would air Trump stump speeches at length.

In a New York Times magazine profile last year, CNN was referred to as the first “major news organization” to give President Donald Trump a platform in the early days of the Republican primaries, a move that was reportedly regularly pushed by Zucker personally.

Adweek reported last week that Fox News has ranked No. 1 in total day viewers for the past 10 weeks and was first in prime time viewership for the past nine weeks. MSNBC came in second place for both categories last week. CNN’s parent company Turner Network ranked No. 2 last week in the key 25 to 54-year-old ratings category — which is the demographic used by networks to sell advertisements — above both Fox News and MSNBC, who came in eighth and ninth place, respectively.    

Read More →

House Judiciary Committee Democrats on Thursday defended Attorney General Jeff Sessions against any attempts by President Trump to oust Sessions from his role.

In a press conference discussing their push to introduce legislation that would protect special counsel Robert Mueller from any of Trump’s potential efforts to ax the special counsel, Judiciary Committee Democrats suggested firing Sessions would be just as much an obstruction of justice as discharging Mueller.

“While no one has been a bigger critic of Jeff Sessions than me, nobody,” Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) said, “with all the damage that Sessions has done and may still do to voting rights, to immigrants, to Latinos, to women, to muslims — if Trump fires Sessions in order to rein in the Russia investigation, there would be no choice, but for this committee to go forward with impeachment. … It will leave a lot of Republicans with no choice but to go forward with us.”

The rest of the committee reiterated that sentiment. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) said replacing the attorney general would begin the “waterfall” of a “constitutional crisis.”

For the Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee on Thursday, the defense of Sessions came alongside a push to introduce legislation that would protect Mueller from Trump’s ire.

The Dems lamented their inability to get language shielding Mueller in the omnibus spending bill set for a vote in the House Thursday.

Democrats also attempted to thrust other provisions into the spending bill, like language that would provide protections for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients, but many of those measures were met with opposition.

Rep. Val Demings (D-FL) said the exclusion of language to protect Mueller in the $1.3 trillion spending bill would just fuel Democrats efforts to keep pushing for Mueller-shielding legislation, which she claims will be necessary to keep Trump, “a narcissist,” from continuing his “pattern” of “reckless disregard for the rule of law.”

Jackson Lee also hinted that the push to protect Mueller may soon prove to be more dire, mentioning “rumoring” that Republican members of the Judiciary Committee may soon make moves that would “shut down” Congress’ Russia investigations.

“I’m sad to say that rumoring, between tonight and tomorrow, are some subpoenas to be issued unilaterally by one party of this committee, and it’s not us, to begin an action on issues that have occurred on individuals who are not in government, per se,” she said.

“And so they want to shut down the Intelligence Committee’s investigation,” she continued. “They want to begin a unilateral investigation on issues that deal with individuals who are no longer in federal government, but they will not look at the President of the United States, who has a history of firing, misleading, calling it a witch hunt and intimidating the deputy attorney general and Attorney General Jeff Sessions.” 

Read More →

The White House is reportedly going on the offensive over a leak of information from President Donald Trump’s briefing papers during his phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Associated Press reported.

On Wednesday evening, a White House official told the AP that it would be a “fireable offense and likely illegal” for a staffer to leak Trump’s briefing papers to the press. The threat comes after a senior administration official reportedly told the AP that Trump was told not to congratulate Putin on his election victory during a phone call earlier this week. According to the official who spoke with the AP, “DO NOT CONGRATULATE” was written in all capital letters on Trump’s briefing papers.

Two other officials told the AP that the White House was now conducting an internal investigation to determine who might have leaked the information.

Trump received criticism from several Republican lawmakers, including Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), for congratulating Putin on his election when it has been widely reported that the election was rigged in Putin’s favor.

Trump on Wednesday defended his praise of Putin on Twitter by saying former President Barack Obama had done the same thing in 2012.

In private, Trump reportedly has told officials and outside advisers that he thinks the leak was part of a maneuver to undermine him by “the deep state,” AP reported.

The White House told reporters Tuesday that it was important for the U.S. to have a good relationship with Russia and that the U.S. couldn’t control the way other countries held their elections. 

Read More →

President Donald Trump on Thursday morning used his Twitter platform to respond to criticism from former Vice President Joe Biden over Trump’s treatment of women.

Trump called Biden “crazy” and claimed he would win if the two got in a fight.

“Crazy Joe Biden is trying to act like a tough guy,” Trump tweeted just after 6 a.m. EST Thursday. “Actually he is weak, both mentally and physically, and yet he threatens me, for the second time, with physical assault. He doesn’t know me, but he would go down fast and hard, crying all the way. Don’t threaten people Joe!”

Trump was likely irked by Biden’s comments at a anti-sexual assault rally at the University of Miami on Tuesday, where he said if he and Trump were in high school together, he would “take him behind the gym and beat the hell out of him” for the way he has talked about women in the past. He specifically referenced Trump’s crude remarks in the now-famous “Access Hollywood” tape.

Biden has made similar comments about Trump in the past. During a campaign rally for former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016, he said the press always asks him if he wishes he were the one debating Trump.

“No I wish we were in high school. I could take him behind the gym. That’s what I wish,” he said at the time.

Biden made combatting sexual assault on college campuses a staple of his vice presidency and launched the “It’s On Us” campaign to push for reform.

Multiple women have accused Trump of sexual harassment or assault, claims the President has denied.

Read More →

The New York Times is defending its reporting on Facebook after a blog raised questions about changes the paper made to a story that suggested Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg opposed aggressively probing Russian activity on the platform.

Law and Crime blogger Colin Kalmbacher alleged that Times reporters changed language about the relationship between Sandberg and outgoing Chief Information Security Officer Alex Stamos after receiving pressure from Facebook’s communications team to soften up the wording.

But the Times reporters and communications team claims the change was just part of routine edits — the difference between a breaking news story and a fuller update.

On March 19, Times reporters Nicole Perlroth, Sheera Frenkel and Scott Shane published a piece outlining the departure of Stamos, the longtime security chief. According to current and former employees who were briefed on the matter and spoke with the Times, Stamos is reportedly set to depart over internal disagreements over how Facebook should handle the spread of false information, following widespread scrutiny over Russian trolls’ use of the platform to influence the 2016 election.

In the initial March 19 story about Stamos’ impending departure, the Times reported that Stamos clashed particularly strongly with Facebook’s Sandberg.

“Mr. Stamos had been a strong advocate inside the company for investigating and disclosing Russian activity on Facebook, often to the consternation of other top executives, including Sheryl Sandberg, the social network’s chief operating officer, according to the current and former employees, who asked not to be identified discussing internal matters.

Facebook did not immediately provide a comment for the Times’ initial story.

The Times deleted the reference to Sandberg in the second iteration of the story and just referred to Sandberg and “other top executives” as “colleagues.”

From the second version of the Times piece:

“Mr. Stamos, who plans to leave Facebook by August, had advocated more disclosure around Russian interference of the platform and some restructuring to better address the issues, but was met with resistance by colleagues, said the current and former employees.”

Kalmbacher claimed that further down in the piece, reporters also softened the language that illustrated tension between the two executives. The Times reporters wrote that Stamos and “other Facebook executives, such as Ms. Sandberg, disagreed early on over how proactive the social network should be in policing its own platform.” The updated story also included a comment from Stamos, who told the Times that his relationship with Sandberg was “productive.”

Since the Times did not issue a correction over the wording change, Kalmbacher suggested that the reporters were strong-armed by Facebook’s communications team to paint Sandberg in a more positive light. According to the current version of the March 19 story about Stamos’ departure, Facebook was contacted, but did not provide the Times with a comment for the piece.

Both Shane and Perlroth have taken to Twitter to defend their reporting, claiming the edits were part of “routine wording changes” and that Law and Crime editors ignored their clarification before publishing.

In a follow-up story published March 20, Perlroth and Frenkel, the other Times reporter who wrote the initial piece, made multiple references to a rocky relationship between Stamos and Sandberg. Sources reportedly told the Times that Stamos “got off on the wrong foot with some executives, including Ms. Sandberg, over how best to police the platform” and that the relationship between Sandberg and Stamos had “deteriorated” by this past October.

“By October, the relationship between Mr. Stamos and Ms. Sandberg had deteriorated over how to handle Russian interference on Facebook and how best to reorganize Facebook’s security team before the midterm elections, according to more than half a dozen people who work or formerly worked at the company. Mr. Stamos proposed that instead of reporting to Facebook’s general counsel, Colin Stretch, he report directly to Facebook’s higher-ups.

“Instead, executives released Mr. Stamos from much of his day-to-day responsibility, employees said.”

The tension over the Times’ reporting on the Facebook departure follows reports that the social media giant has paid “unusual attention” to the public’s perception of CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Sandberg since the 2016 election, according to the Times. Facebook reportedly hired an outside polling company to track the public’s opinion of the top two executives.

The tension also follows months of ongoing public embarrassment for the social media company as it battles consistent reports of oversight errors in its handling of the spread of disinformation on its site. Just last week the Times reported that the data firm that worked with President Donald Trump’s campaign, Cambridge Analytica, had unethically obtained personal information from 50 million Facebook users.

A Times spokesperson pointed TPM to a series of tweets the company’s communications team posted Wednesday afternoon stating the claims in the Law and Crime blog post were “false.” The Times said the updated and follow up stories on Stamos’ departure included even more details about the pair’s disagreeable relationship and that it was “absurd to suggest that Facebook could influence our coverage in any way.”

Read More →

President Donald Trump on Wednesday quoted comments from a Democratic Harvard professor on Twitter to complain about special counsel Robert Mueller, again.

Citing law professor, and former Hillary Clinton supporter, Alan Dershowitz’s comments during an interview on Fox News, Trump reiterated his frustration with Mueller and his probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Trump’s veiled pushback against the special counsel, follows tweets from the President over the weekend when he named Mueller for the first time in his attacks against the Russia investigation. The tweet raised fears among lawmakers that Trump was planning to fire the special counsel, a move that at least two Republicans have claimed would be an impeachable offense.

The White House has consistently pushed back on that message, saying this week that firing Mueller is not even under consideration. 

Read More →

Allegra Kirkland contributed reporting. 

A New York judge dismissed former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page’s defamation suit against Yahoo News’ parent company Tuesday.

Page filed a lawsuit against Oath Inc. in September 2017, claiming a Yahoo News article damaged his business relationships and led to threats against him. A federal judge on Tuesday said the lawsuit lacked factual accusations of defamation, according to the court documents.

When reached for comment, Page pointed TPM to a tweet on his recently created account blaming “slick lawyers” for derailing his lawsuit and promising to file an amended complaint.

In Page’s 400-page complaint, in which he sued several media outlets for defamation, Page claimed that a September 2016 Yahoo News article was the beginning of a onslaught of stories about his past work in Russia and his contacts with Kremlin-linked officials during the 2016 campaign. The Yahoo article outlined a trip Page made to Moscow in July 2016, during which he allegedly met with senior Russian officials, such as Igor Sechin, an associate of Russian President Vladimir Putin and the chairman of Russia’s biggest oil company and Igor Divyekin, a top Putin aide.

Page has denied those reports.

Page represented himself in the lawsuit — as he did during hours of congressional testimony over his contacts with Russia — and was seeking $75,000 in damages.

Read the response to Page’s lawsuit below:

Read More →